AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Richard Gayle

MATHV23 · VO2 · V12 · V05 · MATHV44 · V44 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

Skip if you need structured math instruction; only consider him if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear LecturesDisorganizedTest HeavyDaily QuizzesHomework Misaligned
  • , and disorganized.
  • Homework and class topics often feel out of sync.
  • Quizzes help some students, but exams and confusion still hurt.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Some quizzes are easy if you attend, but and .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Difficulty is moderate overall, but skipped steps and fast pacing raise the cognitive load.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance is repeatedly listed as .

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

and most comments warn about confusion and disorganization.

; no online reviews were analyzed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

A few students call him a , but typos and confusion undercut fairness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Daily quizzes and , though not always full credit for every problem.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Core complaint is unclear, disorganized teaching that forces students onto YouTube and tutoring.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

, with homework as a major but uneven factor.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and , with daily quizzes, heavy test weight, and homework that often lags the lecture.

Main concern

and weak organization make learning depend on outside resources.

What students said

“I learned more watching YouTube videos then from his teachings and PowerPoints.”
MATHV44
“ , and extremely forgetful.”
VO2
“The and is way behind what he is teaching in class.”
V05

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Quizzes are frequent and sometimes easy, while , and occasionally flawed.

Daily QuizzesTest HeavyHomework-Aligned TestsExam Typos Reported

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

of harder exams; one student notes test typos.

Weekly QuizzesTwo ExamsTest HeavyTypos on Tests
“There is a ... Only 2 exams,not easy.”
V05
“There were often typos and .”
VO2
“ .”
V44

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I learned more watching YouTube videos then from his teachings and PowerPoints.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person math reviews with consistent clarity complaints. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ , and extremely forgetful.”

📚

30/100

“I learned more watching YouTube videos then from his teachings and PowerPoints.”

👎 Recommendation

24/100

“The class moved too fast. Instructor frequently skips steps and .”

📝 Assessment Pattern

48/100

“There is a but his explanations are all over the place.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Clarity

  • Instructor frequently skips steps and
  • , and he does not explain the concepts very well

Theme 2

📂 About Organization

  • , and extremely forgetful
  • and is way behind what he is teaching
  • There isn't a real pattern

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Work

  • No home work but quizes ever day
  • Homework could be over 160 problem but we only got credit for 5

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

52/100

Evidence confidence

Six fairly detailed reviews from 2014-2017 agree on disorganization, but the sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATHV231 review
MATHV441 review
V051 review
V121 review
V441 review
Show 1 more courses
VO21 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1