AI Rate Professor

Automotive Technology

Glenn Troub

AUTOV10 · V34 · AUTOAUTO · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
1.0

The decision

Easy grades are possible but teaching reliability is a if you just need the credit.

Best fit · Easy A HunterVery easyAbsentee riskMixed qualityA+ possible
  • Difficulty consistently rated 1 across all reviews
  • One student got A+ but said teacher rarely showed and taught nothing
  • Older reviews say as good as it gets with almost no detail

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

92/100

Difficulty 1 across reviews and an A+ with almost no teaching effort reported.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

90/100

Every review rates difficulty at 1, so content is extremely easy.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

85/100

; others give no attendance pressure.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

40/100

Would-take-again is 0% overall with one strong no and older empty praise.

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

A+ reported with difficulty 1 and almost no instructional effort described.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Workload

Featherlight

90/100

No textbooks needed in one review and no workload complaints; difficulty always 1.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

One scathing absentee review versus older five-star blurbs with almost no detail.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

Evidence comes only from In person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

All in-person; very easy content with split praise versus absenteeism complaint.

Main concern

Teacher may rarely show up and teach little despite easy A potential.

What students said

“Teacher rarely showed up and taught me nothing.”
V34
“As good as it gets”
AUTOAUTO

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher rarely showed up and taught me nothing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting easy grades versus absentee teaching. Credibility rating: Medium.

💤 Absentee Teaching

25/100

“Teacher rarely showed up and taught me nothing.”

🅰️ Easy Credit

92/100

“A+”

👍 Old School Praise

70/100

“As good as it gets”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 1
  • A+
  • Teacher rarely showed up and taught me nothing.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • As good as it gets
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

48/100

Evidence confidence

Three reviews spanning 2007-2016 with thin detail and mixed signals, but consistent low difficulty.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTOAUTO1 review
AUTOV101 review
V341 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values