AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Spitler

ENGV01 · ENGLIV02 · ENGVO3 · ENGVO2 · ENGLV02 · ENGV02 · ENGLV01B · ENGLVO1B · ENGLV01A · ENG3047 · 19 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Solid pick for English if you will do the reading and drafts; expect and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear grading criteriaHelpful feedbackReading heavyEssay focusedOrganized lectures
  • Strong English instructor with , and .
  • , and essays; some find her picky or repetitive.
  • Attendance is expected and workload .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Doing readings, journals, and drafts usually yields a strong grade, though some call her a tough or .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

Typical college English load of reading, discussion, and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

and success depends on being in class.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

84/100

and help, with a minority disliking tone or topics.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

and pre-graded drafts help, but she can be picky or critical on writing.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

Lots of reading and essays plus journals; little busywork beyond the core writing load.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

82/100

and strong feedback with a few cooler reviews.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and class discussion.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students , and fair path to good grades through essays and journals, with some complaints about repetition or .

Main concern

Heavy reading load and ride.

What students said

“Was great at giving detailed and .”
ENGLV01A
“Easy A if you go to class and do the work.”
ENGLV02
“When you turn in your rough draft, she will read them and pre-grade them.”
ENGLIV02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is paper- and journal-driven with .

Essay-focusedReading journalsResearch paperClear paper criteria

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and research papers with detailed criteria.

EssaysReading journalsResearch paperClear criteria
“Was great at giving detailed and .”
ENGLV01A
“You do have to write a lot of essays, but they are super easy.”
ENGLIV02

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great teacher! Easy A if you go to class and do the work. . !”

Voice snapshots generated from 19 , and reading load. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

82/100

“ and her lectures are very relevant to the course.”

📝

78/100

“Was great at giving detailed and .”

👍 Recommendation

84/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and interactive with discussions
  • She walks you through everything, step by step
  • lecture heavy

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you go to class and do the work
  • , but her topics were more than interesting
  • super picky with writing

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • expect a lot of reading
  • No HW other than to do the readings and essays
  • Just make

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

19

Recent reviews read by the AI

19

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Nineteen in-person reviews with , and essay grading across several years.

Inside 19 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGLV01A4 reviews
ENGLV023 reviews
ENGLV01B2 reviews
ENGLVO1B2 reviews
ENGV022 reviews
Show 6 more courses
320021 review
ENG30471 review
ENGLIV021 review
ENGV011 review
ENGVO21 review
ENGVO31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1