AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Nadean Mandel-Toren

CULTV02 · ANTHV02 · ANTHANTH · ANTHVO3 · ANTHV03 · ANTHMO1 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
1.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no alternative and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnorganizedUnpreparedBoring LecturesMismatched TestsRude Or Unhelpful
  • Most reviews describe her as , and confusing.
  • or asks students to study.
  • A minority report easy grades, but overall learning and respect scores are very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

At least one student never scored below 95% and even got a , though grading can still feel arbitrary.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Several call content super easy, while and harsh on exactness, so challenge is inconsistent.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state a .

; all reviews are in person.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Dominant tone is avoid, with repeated warnings about organization, rudeness, and ruined subject interest.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Easy-A reports and a outcomes despite low teaching quality.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Light

70/100

Multiple students call the course super easy with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Repeated claims of , and unhelpful instruction dominate the set.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Tests and study-guide patterns are central .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and frustrating, with lectures that go off topic and tests that mismatch taught material.

Main concern

Poor organization and and leave students learning almost nothing.

What students said

“She did not keep track of what she had gone over with us. Material was repeated and we never got to some material.”
ANTHV02
“She tells you to study one thing and puts an other on the test.”
ANTHANTH
“WARNING!! !”
CULTV02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can demand exact wording, which students find unfair.

Mismatched TestsStudy Guide IncompleteExact Spelling Counts

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests frequently mismatch lectures, study guides disappear after early tests, and exact assignment details matter.

Mismatched TestsStudy Guides For Early Tests OnlyExact Spelling Counts
“She tells you to study one thing and puts an other on the test.”
ANTHANTH
“Only gives study guides for first 2-3 tests then your on your own.”
ANTHV02
“You have to be exact in .”
ANTHVO3

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“WARNING!! ! Worst teacher in my college eduation”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 in-person reviews with highly consistent negative teaching themes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Awful, awful, awful. , and just...a down right idiot.”

📝 Test Mismatch

30/100

“She tells you to study one thing and puts an other on the test.”

🎁 Easy Grade Outlier

78/100

“EASY A! super easy. but and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • lectures are extremly boring & always goes off subject
  • Every class she is unprepared.. !

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • EASY A! super easy.
  • I never scored lower than a 95% on a test.
  • Even if we did not get to it she tested on it.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Frustration

  • This was a frustrating class.
  • .
  • I did not learn a single thing from this class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews over several years show strong consistency on organization and teaching problems despite one easy-A outlier.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ANTHV023 reviews
ANTHANTH1 review
ANTHMO11 review
ANTHV031 review
ANTHVO31 review
Show 1 more courses
CULTV021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values