AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Nadine Toren

ANTHV02 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other option and can learn the material independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProRepetitive LecturesUnpreparedIncomplete CoverageMandatory Attendance
  • Only one old review and it is strongly negative.
  • Lectures repeated material and still failed to cover required content.
  • .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

No grade or , and the class is rated hard with weak teaching support.

All .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Difficulty is high and the instructor failed to cover needed material.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

The .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

The sole review gives very low quality and describes unprepared, incomplete teaching.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

.

Format shift

In-person only; .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload and incomplete content coverage.

Format shift

detail.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Student reports repeated lectures and unfinished required material.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Comments do .

Format shift

No assessment breakdown in the available review.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single in-person review describes disorganized lectures that looped content and left required material unfinished.

Main concern

Missed required material and low lecture quality.

What students said

“Repeated the same material because she forgot she had already talked about it, and was unable to cover all needed material.”
ANTHV02

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

in-person review.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Repeated the same material because she forgot she had already talked about it, and was unable to cover all needed material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting disorganized lectures and incomplete coverage. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

22/100

“Repeated the same material because she forgot she had already talked about it, and was unable to cover all needed material.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“was unable to cover all needed material.”

📌 Attendance

15/100

“Yes”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Repeated the same material because she forgot she had already talked about it
  • unable to cover all needed material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 4
  • Professor QUALITY rating: 1

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2015 review with limited detail and no corroborating comments.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ANTHV021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values