AI Rate Professor

Art History

Sharon Coughran-Rayden

ARTV01 · ART · ARTAPPRECIATIO · DRAWCOMP · ARTAPP · DRAWING · ARTVO1 · ARTHISTORY · ARTVOSOCI · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
52/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you already like art history and will attend and study; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing LecturesAttendance RequiredArt History PassionHigh StandardsSummer Intensive
  • art lovers praise clear passionate lectures while others call class boring and rigid.
  • and often mandatory; skipping hurts.
  • Not a free A but study plus interest can yield A or B with , and papers.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Students report A or B is reachable with study and , but standards are high and effort is real.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Intro content can feel straightforward for art fans but summer pace and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Multiple and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommended mainly by students who love art; .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

High standards appear, yet several students earned A or B with consistent work.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

, and dense reading; summer sections feel especially heavy.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Praise for knowledge and and rigid studio critique.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Mix of , and some studio work or extra-credit field trip.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person art history and studio sections range from highlight lectures for motivated students to long boring slide sessions with strict creative rules.

Main concern

and polarizing pacing make the class painful if you are not into art.

What students said

“She was the highlight of my fall semester! A great lecture class for intro. to art history.”
ARTVO1
“Class sucks, sat there for 3 hours of the most boring pictures ans listen to her talk.!!!!! ”
ARTHISTORY
“it's easy to pass with an A or B. And if you DO like art, you'll love her.”
ARTV01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and a paper; no open-book or proctoring details appear.

MidtermFinalOne Paper

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and paper with study expected.

MidtermFinalOne Paper
“1 midterm/1 final/1 paper. Study, and you'll do fine.”
ARTV01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you don't like art.. this is the most boring class EVER!! ... it's easy to pass with an A or B. And if you DO like art, you'll love her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 in-person reviews spanning 2004-2014, highlighting teaching split, grading effort, and attendance. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“She's a , and makes it interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Split

48/100

“ and !)”

📅

22/100

“ because .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was the highlight of my fall semester!
  • Prof. Sharon is the BEST Art History teacher, knowledgeable, brilliant
  • She lectures pretty much straight out of the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is a tough class. But in all honesty the .
  • it's easy to pass with an A or B
  • This is not a cake walk class, but extremely interesting.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • She will come up and , and that gets annoying.
  • She tears out your creative soul

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen detailed but older reviews (2004-2014) with consistent polarization and limited grade data.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ARTV016 reviews
ART2 reviews
ARTAPP1 review
ARTAPPRECIATIO1 review
ARTHISTORY1 review
Show 4 more courses
ARTVO11 review
ARTVOSOCI1 review
DRAWCOMP1 review
DRAWING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values