AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Michele Abram

PHYC · PHSO101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

Expect a ; thin review data means go in with low expectations for ease.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerNot easyLecture and test heavyBoring deliveryHigh difficultySparse reviews
  • Only two reviews exist and one has no written comment.
  • The detailed review calls the class hard, boring, and .
  • Difficulty ratings are high with middling quality scores.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

The only detailed comment says she is not easy and difficulty ratings sit high.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students flag high difficulty and an expectation that you already know the material.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Quality is middling with no strong recommendation language and very thin evidence.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

; the course is framed as not easy with standard testing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Typical lecture, notes, and but not featherlight load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

One student found lectures boring and demanding; overall quality scores are only middling.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Described as , and test style.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Sparse in-person feedback paints a difficult, lecture-heavy, not-easy course with limited enthusiasm.

Main concern

Hard content and .

What students said

“This teacher was not easy.And the class is boring. Its the , and test style.”
PHYC
“I felt like she expected us to know what she knows.”
PHYC

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment ; no open-book or proctoring details given.

Lecture-based testsIn-person exams

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe a typical lecture-notes-test structure without proctoring or open-book details.

Lecture-based testsIn-person exams
“Its the , and test style.”
PHYC

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This teacher was not easy.And the class is boring.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews with limited detail; credibility Low.

📚 Course Difficulty

28/100

“This teacher was not easy.”

😴 Lecture Style

40/100

“the class is boring. Its the , and test style.”

🎯 Expectations

45/100

“I felt like she expected us to know what she knows.”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This teacher was not easy.
  • I felt like she expected us to know what she knows.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • the class is boring.
  • Its the , and test style.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only two reviews, one without comments, spanning old dates with limited detail and consistency checks.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHSO1011 review
PHYC1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values