AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Luis Gomez

POLSV03 · AMERICANGOVT · AMERICANGOVERN · POLSV01 · POLITALSCIENCE · AMERICANGOV · POLSVO1 · POLV01 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you can self-teach the material and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard to UnderstandStrict AttendanceTricky TestsNo Extra CreditDisconnect With Students
  • Most students struggle with his heavy accent and .
  • and often disconnected from class content.
  • and almost no grade rescue options.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Hard, poorly worded tests plus no make an A a real grind, not a free grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material feels hard mainly because and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students report , and forced presence with little learning value.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most reviews urge students not to take , and low teaching payoff.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

, and reported low grades leave little room to recover.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Workload is not the main complaint; the pain is tests, clarity, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

A few students learn from notes and reading, but , and unhelpful.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Success hinges on tests drawn from books or websites, often poorly aligned with lectures.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and almost no .

Main concern

, and mandatory attendance make success feel disconnected from lectures.

What students said

“If you are an A student like myself and plan to keep it that !”
AMERICANGOVT
“HE IS THE . I highly .”
POLV01
“bad accent and lisp. cannot understand him at all.”
POLSV01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and poorly worded, with little chance to raise the grade.

Tricky WordingTextbook-Based TestsNo Extra CreditHard Exams

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students report hard, confusing tests from the book or outside sites, with no .

Tricky WordingTextbook-Based TestsNo Extra Credit
“The so he doesn't make them.”
AMERICANGOVT
“ . Sometimes questions from chapters not covered yet.”
POLV01
“ .”
AMERICANGOVERN

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are an A student like myself and plan to keep it that !”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

18/100

“ . .”

🗣️ Communication Barrier

25/100

“bad accent and lisp. cannot understand him at all.”

📝 Harsh Testing

28/100

“ . Sometimes questions from chapters not covered yet.”

📌

18/100

“ and not leaving during class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You can be asking a question or talking to him and he ignores you!
  • .
  • Compeletely unhelpful when answering questions.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He refuses to give opportunities for .
  • .
  • At the end of his class he gave me a D.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Advice

  • I should have listened to the other reviewers.
  • .
  • Wouldn't recomend unless you enjoy frustration.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Sixteen older in-person reviews show a consistent negative pattern, but dates are from 2005-2013 and grade data is sparse.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

POLSV015 reviews
POLSVO13 reviews
AMERICANGOVT2 reviews
POLV012 reviews
AMERICANGOV1 review
Show 3 more courses
AMERICANGOVERN1 review
POLITALSCIENCE1 review
POLSV031 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values