AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Chihio Terada

ARCHTV20 · DRFTV43 · DRFTDRFT · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

if you will watch every demo; skip if you need polished lecture polish.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyKnows SolidWorksHands-on demo styleAttendance optionalEasy drafting contentPolarized reviews
  • Two strong reviews praise his SolidWorks and drafting skill and say beginners can learn if they watch carefully.
  • , but skipping means you get lost in demos.
  • One older review is harshly negative and calls for him to leave, so opinions are split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Difficulty ratings are very low and students say even complete beginners can succeed if they watch demos.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Students describe the material as easy and demo-driven rather than conceptually heavy.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

, though missing class means you will get lost.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Two glowing multi-class endorsements clash with one blunt call for him to leave, so recommendation is mixed.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

65/100

No grade data, but low difficulty and beginner if you follow demos.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

75/100

Comments focus on watching .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Strong praise for SolidWorks expertise is offset by one harsh personal critique and notes about blunt respect.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize hands-on drafting and SolidWorks practice over formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person drafting and architecture-related classes feel easy if you pay attention to live demos; respect tone is blunt but content mastery is high for many.

Main concern

Sparse, very old reviews plus one strongly negative take make the overall picture unreliable.

What students said

“Great teacher had him for 3 classes kick back attendance not required but you wont learn.”
DRFTDRFT
“Awesome teacher! you can go in as a complete idiot on solidworks and learn.”
DRFTV43
“he is old and needs to leave”
ARCHTV20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews , so .

Demo-based learningNo clear exam policy stated

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No student comments clearly describe midterms, finals, open-book rules, or proctoring.

No clear exam policy stated
“Dont expect to take notes, or to be treated with great respect, but the man knows his stuff.”
DRFTV43

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Awesome teacher! you can go in as a complete idiot on solidworks and learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting skill . Credibility rating: Low.

🛠️ Hands-On Mastery

72/100

“the man knows his stuff.”

👀 Watch the Demo or Fail

80/100

“if u dont your going to screw up so dont be bs in his class or you'll get lost.”

📅

88/100

“ but you wont learn.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great teacher had him for 3 classes
  • you can go in as a complete idiot on solidworks and learn
  • the man knows his stuff.

Theme 2

⚠️ About Concerns

  • he is old and needs to leave
  • Dont expect to take notes, or to be treated with great respect

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three very old reviews (2008-2012) with thin detail and mixed sentiment reduce reliability.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARCHTV201 review
DRFTDRFT1 review
DRFTV431 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values