AI Rate Professor

Social Work

Carol Greeby

BUSV27A · BUS3695 · BUS27 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Do not take her class if .

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnresponsivePoor Content KnowledgeRushed TestingInflexibleDo Not Take
  • Students say she is and unhelpful when contacted.
  • Quizzes and tests are frequent and sometimes absurdly short on time.
  • Multiple reviews claim weak command of medical terminology and technology.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Constant quizzes and little instructional support make a high grade feel like continuous cramming.

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Students say there is never enough time to learn before the .

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

; inflexibility around orientation and .

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Reviews strongly and poor teaching.

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Inflexible scheduling and .

Format shift

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Quiz or test every class forces constant cramming with little learning time.

Format shift

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Students describe weak content knowledge, no answers to questions, and unhelpful communication.

Format shift

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Nearly all comments center on frequent quizzes and tests rather than assignments.

Format shift

All analyzed reviews are treated as in person per isForOnlineClass flags.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Reviews mark format as in person and , and weak medical terminology instruction.

Main concern

, and constant high-stakes quizzes with inadequate learning time.

What students said

“ !!! I would not recommend this teacher to my enemies!!”
BUS3695
“On many occasions gave us 5 minutes to take an .”
BUS27
“ and is impossible to get ahold of in any way.”
BUSV27A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessments are frequent, severely timed, and paired with .

Extremely Short Timed QuizzesTest Every ClassInflexible Final Scheduling

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe entire quizzes or and finals that are hard to reschedule.

5-Minute TestsQuiz Every ClassHard-to-Reschedule Final
“On many occasions gave us 5 minutes to take an .”
BUS27
“I because of and it was like pulling teeth.”
BUS3695

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ !!! I took her online class for medical terminology. I would not recommend this teacher to my enemies!! she was dreadful!”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews treated as in person by source flags, highlighting unresponsiveness and rushed testing. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

16/100

“She hardly knows how to use medical terminology herself.”

⏰ Assessment Pressure

28/100

“On many occasions gave us 5 minutes to take an .”

📧 Communication

15/100

“ and is impossible to get ahold of in any way.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Couldn't answer our questions.
  • Never gave us adequate time to learn anything.
  • for someone teaching an online class she knows very little about technology...or medical terminology!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Pace

  • We had to constantly cram just to prepare for the .
  • gave us 5 minutes to take an

Theme 3

🚫 Overall Warning

  • !!!
  • She was inflexible and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Four consistent negative reviews from 2010-2012 provide clear themes despite the small sample.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

BUSV27A2 reviews
BUS271 review
BUS36951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values