AI Rate Professor

Journalism

Star Hunter

JOURV02 · JOURVO1 · JOUR01 · JOURV05A · JOURV01 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you are self-directed and can handle uneven organization and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHit-or-Miss Online SupportExtra Credit AvailableUnclear ProjectsCaring but DisorganizedLate Work Friendly
  • Student and frustrating non-responsive teaching.
  • Workload can feel heavy with , and tests.
  • Communication and organization are the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

Several students report Easy A paths with and lenient late-work rules, though .

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews, even when students mentioned online delivery.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

Content difficulty is mid-range, but heavy weekly tasks and .

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed from reviews.

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

and horrible unhelpful ones.

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Students mention , not being a , and very late paper acceptance.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Workload

Heavy

34/100

Multiple students report a ton of weekly work, discussions, projects, and tests that feel overloaded.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Praise for caring and help, mess grades, and tears of frustration.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

, and tests rather than relying on one format.

Format shift

All analyzed evidence comes from In person-tagged reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

some call her caring and refused help, messy grades, and unclear projects.

Main concern

Inconsistent responsiveness and chaotic.

What students said

“Easy A”
JOURV01
“I have never had a professor outright refuse to help me until I took this class.”
JOUR01
“She allows students to turn in , how sweet is that!”
JOURVO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and projects but do not clearly prove open-book, take-home, or strict proctoring rules.

Tests mentionedProjects and RATsLittle proctoring detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Students reference tests, RATs, and projects, but reviews do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Tests mentionedProjects and RATs
“The instructions and due dates for daily discussions, RATs, projects, and tests were laid out in advance and .”
JOURV01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I have never had a professor outright refuse to help me until I took this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in support consistency, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She's a horrible teacher.”

📈 Easy A Potential

76/100

“Easy A”

📦 Workload Load

34/100

“There was a ton of work due weekly, but she offers opportunities.”

❤️ Student Care

70/100

“Star is by far the . She really cares about her students and wants them to succeed.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Hunter provided a wonderful online learning experience.
  • She's a . All her work is hard.
  • She might be a and seems to get lost during the class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A
  • and not a
  • She allows students to turn in

Theme 3

💬 About Support & Response

  • I had no problem getting responses from her regarding any questions/concerns.
  • Rarely ever responded to e-mails and grades were a mess.
  • her response to help questions were to read the text.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed but older reviews show consistent split opinions, so patterns are usable but not fully current.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

JOURV013 reviews
JOUR012 reviews
JOURV021 review
JOURV05A1 review
JOURVO11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values