AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Connie Jenkins

ARTV12A · ART0 · ARTV12 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if you want a and real skill-building.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyBest art teacherMinimal homeworkGenerous and understandingHelpful skill coachingFun classroom vibe
  • Students repeatedly call her an .
  • Workload is light with fun projects and .
  • She supports growth with and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

Students , and an easy class while still learning useful skills.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable with .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students strongly recommend her and and painting.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

85/100

Described as understanding and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

and manageable assignments.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students , and fun class energy.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on projects, exercises, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Consistently praised as a , snacks, and strong individual help.

Main concern

A few students found her personality somewhat cold at first.

What students said

“ .”
ARTV12
“Gave interesting and fun class projects and minimal (if .”
ARTV12
“She wants her students to excel and it shows.”
ARTV12A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects and exercises with little mention of strict formal exams.

Project-based workMinimal homework

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and class projects rather than harsh testing.

Project-based workMinimal homework
“Gave interesting and fun class projects and minimal (if .”
ARTV12
“ , and will help you with anything you're having trouble with.”
ARTV12

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . i had her for drawing and painting and i'm taking her again.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching quality, workload, and class atmosphere. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“ .”

🪶 Light Workload

82/100

“minimal (if ”

👍 Strong Recommendation

92/100

“i highly recomend her!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Skilled artist who (politely) helps you pinpoint your trouble areas
  • great teaching methods
  • A sweet old lady with a true passion for art

Theme 2

🎨 About Class Vibe

  • brought snacks for the class and always played music
  • makes the class fun and gets work done

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the class was easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Five consistently positive in-person reviews from 2005-2011 with solid detail but older dates.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ARTV123 reviews
ART01 review
ARTV12A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values