AI Rate Professor

Fine Arts

Myra Toth

CERAMBEG · CERAMBEGG · CERAMICS1 · CERGLAZ · ART51 · CERAMICS12 · CERAMICSVO1 · CERAMICS · 10 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

unless you are highly independent and , and uneven treatment.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPlays favoritesUnclear gradingStrict attendanceHands-off then harshInterpersonal issues
  • Many students report favoritism, mean or off-handed treatment, and .
  • Attendance and punctuality are policed strictly while her own lateness is criticized.
  • A and freedom-giving, but overall tone is strongly negative.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who complete work report surprise B or D grades and opaque standards, so an A is not reliable.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Studio content can be fun and free-form, but uneven instruction and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple reviews stress no absences or tardies, with grade harm after only two missed days.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students urge taking anyone else due to mean behavior, favoritism, and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Students report , and uneven standards.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Projects and long studio blocks matter, but the bigger pain is policy and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Helpful moments exist, yet many describe absence mid-class, unhelpful involvement, and poor interpersonal skills.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and opaque studio evaluation more than formal exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ceramics often feels unfair and personality-driven: favorites get attention, others feel neglected or graded inconsistently, with .

Main concern

Unclear grading, favoritism, and harsh or .

What students said

“Except for her favorites she was off-handed and often mean to everyone else.”
ART51
“Having missed two days she gave me a D I can not believe this she was so .”
CERAMBEGG
“She does not tell you how she grades, and ”
CERAMICS
“ and we have a lot of freedom on what we make. She is strict about being absent, but other than that ”
CERAMBEG

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly project and attendance driven; midterms exist but .

Project basedUnclear grading criteriaStrict attendance impact

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

one midterm mentioned and unclear grade logic.

ProjectsMidterm mentionedAttendance penalties
“I aced the missed one day & I got a B”
CERAMBEG
“Having missed two days she gave me a D I can not believe this she was so .”
CERAMBEGG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Except for her favorites she was off-handed and often mean to everyone else. Away from the class most of the time and . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 10 in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010, highlighting favoritism, unclear grading, and . Credibility rating: High.

🚫

22/100

“ . I don't know why she is still teaching”

⚖️

22/100

“Having missed two days she gave me a D I can not believe this she was so .”

👑 Favoritism Pattern

25/100

“Except for her favorites she was off-handed and often mean to everyone else.”

⏰

15/100

“Don't ever miss class or be tardy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hands off teahcer, for the most part, but when she does get .
  • She disappears in the middle of class and if you have a question, you're SOL.
  • Very poor with interpersonal skills.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She does not tell you how she grades
  • I got a B, I have literally no clue as to how this happened
  • she gave me a D

Theme 3

⏰

  • She is strict about being absent
  • Don't ever miss class or be tardy.
  • Show up ON TIME! (but you may have to wait for her to get there)

Theme 4

❤️ Mixed Student Reactions

  • my whole class really likes
  • I had a fun time in that class and
  • class itself was fun

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

10

Recent reviews read by the AI

10

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Ten in-person reviews from 2005-2010 show consistent themes of , and strict attendance despite a few positive outliers.

Inside 10 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ART512 reviews
CERAMBEG2 reviews
CERAMBEGG1 review
CERAMICS1 review
CERAMICS11 review
Show 3 more courses
CERAMICS121 review
CERAMICSVO11 review
CERGLAZ1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values