AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Daniel Jordan

SOCV02 · SOCVO1 · SOC10 · SOCVO3 · SOCV01 · SOCVO2 · AESV11 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
64/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a caring social-science teacher with manageable daily work, but expect full class periods and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardGroup examsEasy homeworkNever lets out earlyUnexplained gradesKnowledgeable storyteller
  • Many students call him nice, knowledgeable, and .
  • and .
  • , and classes that run the full period.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Group tests and easy homework help grades, but and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

and , so content challenge stays moderate.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

Students say , and participate, and he rarely lets class out early.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

Most reviews praise learning and care, tempered by a minority of grade-dispute complaints.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, but multiple students report Cs or Bs with .

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, but and full-period classes add load.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Often described as nice, knowledgeable, and invested in student success, with some boring lectures.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and occasional no-test formats.

Format shift

Based only on in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Students mostly praise kindness and learning, with and , but a few report harsh unexplained grades and long papers.

Main concern

Final grades or .

What students said

“Mid term and so it made it easy and fun!”
SOCV02
“he cares for .”
SOCVO2
“he gave me a C without and explanation and that ended up ruining my GPA”
SOCVO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Several courses use group midterms and .

Group MidtermGroup FinalResearch Paper

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Multiple reviews report group midterms and when tests are fewer.

Group MidtermGroup FinalLong FinalResearch Paper
“Mid term and so it made it easy and fun!”
SOCV02
“no tests,but a and .”
SOCV01
“the midterm and on both”
SOCVO1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“if u need a good teacher here is one. you can tell he is not in it for the money”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, , and grade transparency issues. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“i love him. ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

66/100

“If you have any passion for !”

⚖️

48/100

“he gave me a C without and explanation and that ended up ruining my GPA”

📝

72/100

“Mid term and so it made it easy and fun!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and informative!
  • you learn in his class. just do hw attend class and participate.
  • He is very knowledgeable about the subject of racial and ethnic relations

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The hw is really easy and the midterm and
  • He gave me my first B and ruined my 4.0 GPA.
  • . no tests,but a and .

Theme 3

⏱️ About Class Time

  • HE NEVER LETS YOU OUT EARLY!
  • he wont let class out early often.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Nine in-person reviews from 2004-2010 with mixed but recurring themes; older sample and no grade distribution limit certainty.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

SOCV022 reviews
SOCVO22 reviews
AESV111 review
SOC101 review
SOCV011 review
Show 2 more courses
SOCVO11 review
SOCVO31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values