AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Jim Robbins

N232 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him if you want a and effort.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair GraderGreat FeedbackClinical GuidanceParticipation MattersKnowledgeable Lecturer
  • Students describe Robbins as knowledgeable, fair, helpful, and .
  • The course rewards effort and preparation rather than being a no-work Easy A.
  • Participation and being ready for class matter, especially in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

An A is realistic, but students stress full effort, preparation, and .

The online review sounds easier, while and active participation expectations.

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The , but nursing and critical care content still require preparation.

Online evidence frames the class as introductory, while and lecture engagement.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as mandatory, but participation and in-class questioning make showing up important.

In-person reviews support participation expectations, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students recommend him because , and .

Both formats are positive, but the and more clinically focused.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Students call his grading fair and say effort is recognized, but no one describes him as an automatic A.

Format shift

, while in-person grading is tied to effort and participation.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload appears manageable but not light, with , and participation.

Format shift

Online has a few graded components, while in-person requires class preparation and active response.

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students describe him as exceptional, knowledgeable, helpful, funny, fair, and .

Format shift

Online evidence supports a helpful introduction, while and clinical teaching quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

The , and a short paper, while in-person reviews emphasize participation and lecture preparation.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence includes participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students praise , and , while noting participation and preparation matter.

Main concern

He may call on students, so coming unprepared can be uncomfortable.

What students said

“If you give your full effort, it won't go unnoticed.”
N232
“He likes to call on people and ask questions”
N232
“ ”
N232

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online review describes an introductory nursing class with , and a short paper.

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one review, so online conclusions are low confidence.

What students said

“ , and a short paper.”
N232

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and a final, with no clear proof of open-book rules or proctoring.

QuizzesFinalShort PaperReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, final, open-book, closed-book, or proctoring policies.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format

Online

Online evidence says grades include quizzes, a final, and a short paper, but reviews .

QuizzesFinalShort Paper
“ , and a short paper.”
N232

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you give your full effort, it won't go unnoticed.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“Mr Robbins is an exceptional .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“You definitely want to be apart of his group.”

⚖️

68/100

“He is a remarkable lecturer who grades fairly.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is a remarkable lecturer who grades fairly.
  • he's fun, mellow, and a great clinical teacher as well.
  • Mr Robbins is awesome for lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort & Grades

  • If you give your full effort, it won't go unnoticed.
  • Make sure you look over your lecture content before class.
  • , and a short paper.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • Communication is not an issue with him.
  • He is always open to help and give guidance if you just ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, so the tone is consistent but the evidence base is small.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

N2324 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B+ 1 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values