AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Hilda Flores-Pozos

PYSC101 · PSY160 · PSYC103 · PYSCH241 · PSYC245 · PSY101 · PSYC241 · PSYC210 · PSYC101 · PSY241 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you are comfortable teaching yourself from the textbook and tracking deadlines without much instructor support.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAbsent InstructorSlow CommunicationTextbook HeavyMixed GradingSelf-Taught Course
  • Online students often describe her as , and .
  • Several students still earned A grades because the course structure can be straightforward if .
  • Older in-person reviews are more mixed, with and others calling lectures boring or unclear.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

65/100

Many students earned A grades, but they usually had to keep up with , and .

Online reviews suggest easier grading but more self-teaching, while and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

58/100

The material is usually manageable, but , and weak support can make it feel harder.

Online courses feel more self-guided and textbook-based, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

, while online classes require steady independent deadline tracking rather than physical attendance.

Online evidence centers on self-management, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

Recommendation is low because many students complain , and lack of teaching presence.

Online reviews are mostly negative about instructor presence, while and include several older positive experiences.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

Grades can be attainable, but students report , and some transparency concerns.

Format shift

but poorly explained, while in-person comments range from fair structure to serious transparency complaints.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Work , and exams, but many students found it manageable with planning.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize textbook assignments and quizzes, while , and essays.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is weakened , and reliance on textbook or PowerPoint material.

Format shift

Online reviews are much more negative about absence, while and boring unclear lectures.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessments include , and PowerPoint-based tasks.

Format shift

Online reviews mention quizzes, assignments, midterm, final, and essays, while , and essays.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and negative reports of poor clarity, weak transparency, and boring PowerPoints.

Main concern

Attendance and reading matter, but communication and transparency can be inconsistent.

What students said

“Professor Pozos made class really interesting.”
PSY101
“Easy class to pass, just attend every class session!”
PYSC101
“This professor made psychology class very boring.”
PSY101

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews mostly describe a self-guided course with , and weak email support.

Main concern

Students say .

What students said

“It felt like she was nonexistent, and most of the work was heavy on the textbook.”
PSYC103
“She NEVER video lectured or responded to any emails.”
PSYC241
“I have absolutely no idea how I .”
PYSCH241

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and exams with some timing pressure and reported confusion, but strict proctoring is not proven.

Timed Online QuizzesMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedExam Errors Mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and study-guide concerns, but they do not clearly prove the exam format, open-book status, or proctoring rules.

Final MentionedNo Study Guide Mentioned
“she removed me from the class as soon as the ”
PSYC103
“Ususally does not give a study guide so and read the book.”
PYSC101

Online

Online , and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, open-book status, or proctoring rules.

Timed Online QuizzesMidterm MentionedFinal MentionedConfusing Exams
“ .”
PSYC245
“she gave us only 5 mins for a 5 question quiz and now 1 hr for 50 questions.”
PSY241
“ ”
PSYC210

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Get ready to learn by yourself.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She NEVER video lectured or responded to any emails.”

📚 Workload Pattern

55/100

“Online course was very straightforward. Read the chapter, take a 5 question quiz, & a 2-3 question assignment each week.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

35/100

“To everyone considering taking a class with Professor Flores, DON'T.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Instructor Presence

  • It felt like she was nonexistent, and most of the work was heavy on the textbook.
  • She NEVER video lectured or responded to any emails.
  • This professor gives poor feedback and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She was pretty easy, but lacked in communication.
  • Online course was very straightforward.
  • as 1 hr and all on the book

Theme 3

🏫 About In-Person Class

  • Professor Pozos made class really interesting.
  • Easy class to pass, just attend every class session!
  • This professor made psychology class very boring.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 16 reviews cover both formats over many years, but opinions and newer online complaints.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PSYC1034 reviews
PSY1012 reviews
PSYC2412 reviews
PSYC2452 reviews
PSY1601 review
Show 5 more courses
PSY2411 review
PSYC1011 review
PSYC2101 review
PYSC1011 review
PYSCH2411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 7

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2