AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Sevada Chamras

CHEM110 · CHEM · CHEM100 · CHEM212 · OCHEM · CHEM112 · CHEM110211 · OCHEM211 · CHEMISTRY110 · CHEM101 · CHEM110211212 · OCHEM8791 · CHEM110111112 · CHEM211 · 38 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can self-study chemistry, tolerate strict expectations, and manage uncertainty in organization and communication.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerClear but inconsistent teachingDisorganized CanvasHard chemistry workloadStrict expectationsSlow communication
  • many praise Chamras as , and strong at chemistry, while .
  • Organic chemistry and , and discipline to earn a strong grade.
  • Online reviews are notably weaker, citing messy , and one proctoring-related final exam issue.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

A is possible in some sections, but comments repeatedly stress hard study, strict policies, tough grading, and .

, while online evidence makes the A riskier because of disorganization and communication issues.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Chemistry and especially organic chemistry are intellectually .

In-person difficulty depends heavily on course level, while online reviews describe CHEM100 as hard because .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not prove a , but comments show he expects discipline, participation, and timely work.

, though online comments show deadlines and technical requirements can be unforgiving.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on student independence because strong teaching comments are offset by disorganization, strictness, and weak online support.

In-person reviews are mixed but often positive for prepared students, while online reviews are more cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students describe , and assignments, with limited grade visibility adding stress.

Format shift

Online reviews report tough grading and technical risk, while and hard organic chemistry expectations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

The workload is heavy because students must study consistently, complete labs and quizzes, and often rely on outside practice or self-study.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize self-study and at-home experiments, while and hard chemistry content.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

He can explain chemistry well and make it interesting, but reviews also cite disorganization, poor communication, moodiness, and .

Format shift

In-person evidence is more balanced and includes strong praise, while online evidence and response problems.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Assessment leans toward tests, quizzes, lab reports, and finals, with several comments calling the class test-heavy or grade-limited.

Format shift

Online and evidence adding a proctoring issue for a final exam.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

35 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but and chemistry knowledge while warning about strictness, difficulty, and occasional disorganization.

Main concern

Students may face hard exams, strict late policies, limited grade visibility, and an uneven teaching style.

What students said

“He's amazing at breaking down complex concepts and connecting them to make the bigger picture easier to understand.”
CHEM110
“Really difficult class in general, not a very good teacher, so I suggest taking this somewhere else.”
CHEM211

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly , and technical support despite some useful lecture videos.

Main concern

Canvas confusion, slow responses, and .

What students said

“Pretty much self study. .”
CHEM100
“I emailed the prof because I had trouble with protorio and and they never responded .”
CHEM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews mention test-heavy grading, no for practice exams, strict policies, and .

Test HeavyProctorio IssueNo Practice Exam KeysStrict Late PolicyNo Clear Open-Book Evidence

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

practice exam keys, and strict deadlines, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules.

Test HeavyQuizzesNo Practice Exam KeysStrict Deadlines
“ .”
CHEM212
“Seemed inconsistent in .”
CHEM211

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Proctorio trouble on the final and , but do not clearly prove webcam use, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Proctorio IssueOnline Final ExamTest Heavy
“I emailed the prof because I had trouble with protorio and and they never responded .”
CHEM100
“Class was v hard though. Pretty much self study.”
CHEM100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you just want to get a good grade without works. Really need to study hard to get good grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 38 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and online risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“He's amazing at breaking down complex concepts and connecting them to make the bigger picture easier to understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

45/100

“ .”

⚖️

30/100

“May seem easy but he is a and quizzes, although quizzes are fair.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • If you have the chance to take this professor for Chem, don't miss it!
  • This professor was unprofessional and disorganized.
  • He is the best chemistry teacher on campus!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Do not slack off, or your grade will completely fall!
  • Really need to study hard to get good grade.
  • extremely difficult. brace yourself if you plan to take him for OChem.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Pretty much self study. .
  • The lecture videos are great and very informative. But the professor is late with responding.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

38

Recent reviews read by the AI

38

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 38 reviews span many years and include specific recurring themes, though some older short reviews reduce precision.

Inside 38 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

CHEM1109 reviews
CHEM1008 reviews
CHEM2125 reviews
CHEM2113 reviews
CHEM1012 reviews
Show 11 more courses
1101 review
2111 review
CHEM1 review
CHEM1101111121 review
CHEM1102111 review
CHEM1102112121 review
CHEM1121 review
CHEMISTRY1101 review
OCHEM1 review
OCHEM2111 review
OCHEM87911 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1