AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Mittendorf

PHIL100 · PHIL104 · PHIL200 · PHIL103 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
92.86%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Robert Mittendorf is highly recommended if you will keep up with , and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring ProfessorClear ExpectationsLenient GraderGreat FeedbackDiscussion Based
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as , and passionate about philosophy.
  • Grades are very attainable with reading, participation, and and leniency.
  • The main caution is that , and attendance or participation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic with , and participation, but it is not a pure no-effort grade.

Online reviews stress turning work in and managing essays, while and active participation.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

76/100

Philosophy concepts can be abstract, but students say and keeps the course straightforward.

Online reviews mention reading and writing load, while and discussion-based understanding.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation are mandatory or graded, while online reviews focus more on deadlines.

The ; online reviews do not clearly prove a live attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and makes philosophy engaging.

Both online and especially strong and recent.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

86/100

Students call him fair and lenient, mention , extensions, late work with small penalties, and .

Format shift

Online reviews give the clearest leniency evidence, while as lenient and straightforward.

Workload

Light

78/100

Work is usually manageable if students keep up, though some , and long essays.

Format shift

Online workload can be heavier because of essays and readings, while as manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students repeatedly praise , and ability to make philosophy understandable.

Format shift

Both formats show excellent teaching, with and classroom support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Grades appear driven mainly by essays, readings, homework, discussion, participation, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and essays, while , and attendance.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are extremely positive, highlighting clear lectures, caring support, manageable work, and .

Main concern

Students who dislike group discussion or .

What students said

“ .”
PHIL100
“Just attend the class and be active during lecture would gain an easy A.”
PHIL104
“ .”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online , and accessible support, with some caution about reading and essays.

Main concern

A few online assignments can become stressful if essays and .

What students said

“Will is a very understanding professor and is great at communicating.”
PHIL103
“required lots of reading and writing, but it really makes you think outside of the box.”
PHIL100
“Easy A if .”
PHIL103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays, assignments, readings, and participation, so , and open-book rules are not clearly proven.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, closed-book rules, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“ .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“Definitely recommend this class, 10/10.”

⚖️

86/100

“Really glad I took his class. Hes a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He will not let anything go until he knows the entire class understands.
  • Professor Mittendorf is very passionate about Philosophy.
  • He makes philosophy easy to understand through his lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if .
  • Work is very manageable.
  • this is one class where your grade isn't handed to you, you have to work and keep up to get that A.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He is a professor that cares and will go out of his way to help with anything you don't understand.
  • Professor Mittendorf is caring, encouraging, and .
  • . .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fourteen reviews across online and in-person formats are highly consistent, recent enough overall, and , and workload.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL1005 reviews
PHIL1035 reviews
PHIL1042 reviews
PHIL2002 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

12 reported outcomes

A range

11

A+ 3 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values