AI Rate Professor

Art amp Design

Alison kuo

ART121 · ART110 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
42.86%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take her only if you want detailed critique and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderDetailed CritiquesInconsistent RespectCaring In PersonWeak Online Delivery
  • as hard and picky, especially for artwork.
  • In-person reviews are sharply split between strong improvement-focused teaching and frustration with strict critique.
  • Online reviews are strongly negative about respect, lecture quality, and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

An A is possible, but comments repeatedly say she grades hard and often lands students in the B range.

Both formats mention tough grading, with the grade pressure.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The art content itself is manageable, but picky critique and .

, while online difficulty centers on poor delivery and feedback.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation and , and one student reports attendance mistakes.

, while online reviews do not clearly discuss flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is split, but recent negative reviews and online complaints make her a risky choice.

In-person students are divided, while online students strongly discourage taking her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students repeatedly call her a tough or , and several .

Format shift

giving the clearest examples.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

and critique than on workload volume, so the workload appears moderate rather than overwhelming.

Format shift

Neither format gives strong evidence of .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Some in-person students praise her care and feedback, but online students describe disrespect, repetition, and poor teaching materials.

Format shift

In-person teaching is polarized, while online teaching is consistently criticized.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention artwork, quizzes, lectures, and critique, with .

Format shift

, while online reviews mention quizzes and lecture materials.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

either feel picky or genuinely helpful for skill growth.

Main concern

The main .

What students said

“it is very difficult to get an A.”
ART121
“She is a , but she honestly helped me improve so much because of that.”
Art110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students report , and .

Main concern

Online reviews describe repetitive lectures, low production quality, and bias in grading.

What students said

“She constantly brags that is she is tenure and can't be fired.”
Art110
“The , visual examples/images are often too blurry”
Art110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove the .

Quiz ConcernsExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly .

Quizzes MentionedPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“The ”
Art110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is a , but she honestly helped me improve so much because of that.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She is a , but she honestly helped me improve so much because of that.”

⚖️

25/100

“it is very difficult to get an A.”

💻 Online Experience

30/100

“10/10 Would Not Take!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She never talked down to students when they forgot their supplies, but simply tried to help them
  • Excessively repeats herself during lectures and will turn 30 minutes of info into 2.5 hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • if you want an easy B
  • She does grade hard, but she helped me improve so much.

Theme 3

💬

  • She is not respectful to us.
  • She is a , but she honestly helped me improve so much because of that.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews across recent years give useful but polarized evidence, with only two online reviews.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

Art1106 reviews
ART1211 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values