AI Rate Professor

English

Janet Mitchell-Lambert

ENGL102 · ENGL221B · ENGL100 · ENG102 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 27 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
44.44%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding writing course and can commit and papers.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadMany PapersCaring but DemandingConfusing OrganizationEffort-Based Grades
  • Students consistently describe a very heavy workload with frequent reading, papers, and Canvas assignments.
  • Many students , and wants students to improve, but the work often feels excessive.
  • Getting an A is possible, but it usually requires steady effort and strong time management.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

A grades are common, but students repeatedly say they require large amounts of reading, papers, and weekly assignments.

Both formats show possible A grades, but .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The writing content is not described as conceptually impossible, but the pace and volume make the course feel challenging.

, while in-person students focus on the sheer amount of assignments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Several in-person tags and comments suggest attendance or steady participation is important, with little evidence of flexibility.

; online reviews do not clearly discuss attendance rules.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Students admire her kindness, but many directly warn against taking the class because the workload feels excessive.

Online reviews are more split, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades can be high when students complete the work, but missed or .

Format shift

Both formats show high grades, but grades hard to protect.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

The , and busy work across many semesters.

Format shift

Both formats report heavy work, with .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students often call her caring and kind, but , and poor organization.

Format shift

Online criticism centers on Canvas organization and feedback, while and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Reviews , and papers far more than exams.

Format shift

Both formats appear assignment-heavy, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are more negative overall because students repeatedly , and strict time demands.

Main concern

The amount of homework and papers can overwhelm students taking other classes or working.

What students said

“ !! so MUCH work assigned on top of ”
ENG100
“On average I have spent 20 hours a week .”
ENG100
“ unless you want to spend 4+ hours a night doing HW.”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising her care and , and weak feedback.

Main concern

The online workload and and hard to navigate.

What students said

“it is A LOT OF WORK.”
ENGL221B
“the organization and flow of .”
ENG102
“This class is a huge waste of time, find something else.”
ENGL221B

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly establish exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Format

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, or final exam format.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove In-Person Exam Policy

Online

Online reviews do not clearly .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Online Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you want to spend 4+ hours a night doing HW.”

Voice snapshots generated from 27 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and course format differences. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Reality

10/100

“On average I have spent 20 hours a week .”

👩‍🏫 Teaching Quality

42/100

“She cares and is going to turn you into a better student.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

36/100

“Please do not take this class, look for a different Professor unless you like spending endless hours trying to complete everything on time.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • it is A LOT OF WORK.
  • She gives a LOT of .
  • AMOUNT OF !
  • unless you want to spend 4+ hours a night doing HW.

Theme 2

❤️ About Personality

  • Professor Mitchell-Lambert is an .
  • She definitely cares about all of her students.
  • and understanding about students and their needs but not a push over.

Theme 3

🧭 About Organization

  • the .
  • tabs.
  • the organization and flow of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

27

Recent reviews read by the AI

27

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is highly credible because 27 reviews across many years consistently repeat the same workload and organization themes.

Inside 27 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 55
1 out of 510

Course coverage

ENG10013 reviews
ENG1025 reviews
ENG1033 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENGL221B2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ENGL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 5 · A 8

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1