AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Hyun Ko

CHEM110 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this professor unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized lecturesTests do not match notesTough gradingFast paceStudents advise dropping
  • Students overwhelmingly warn against taking this class.
  • Reviews , and .
  • Quizzes and exams often include material students say was not taught.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Even high grades appear hard-earned because students report , and .

Both formats describe assessment mismatch, with stronger in-person evidence because five reviews repeat the same problem.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

CHEM110 is made much harder , and quizzes on material students say was not taught.

The online review also reports untaught material, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , and participation tags appear in negative in-person reviews.

Online evidence does not discuss attendance, while but is not clearly beneficial.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

4/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because the and assessments feel unfair.

The one online review is negative, and the in-person reviews are even more severe with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students report grade share, and material not covered in lectures.

Format shift

, while in-person evidence gives repeated examples of harsh quiz and .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

The workload is not always described as massive, but and prepare heavily for misaligned assessments.

Format shift

Online workload detail is limited, while and at-home work.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently describe her as disorganized, unclear, fast-paced, and .

Format shift

Both formats criticize organization, with in-person reviews showing much stronger and more detailed frustration.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Grades appear heavily driven by quizzes, exams, labs, and .

Format shift

Online evidence mentions quizzes, exams, and labs, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and exams that do not match notes.

Main concern

Students report because lectures and assessments do not align.

What students said

“She moves fast during lectures and .”
CHEM110
“RUN, you have no business being here.”
CHEM110
“She puts material that was not even taught on the quizzes and makes them 60 percent of your grade.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review , and lab grading is tough.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“She always put something that she hasn't teach on the and .”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students repeatedly say quizzes and exams include untaught material and do not match notes.

Untaught Material on ExamsMisaligned TestsLow Exam AveragesQuizzes Worth 60 Percent

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

notes, quiz content is untaught, and class exam averages were low, but proctoring or open-book rules are not clearly proven.

Tests Do Not Match NotesUntaught Quiz MaterialLow Exam AveragesQuizzes Worth 60 Percent
“ ; the class average for .”
CHEM110
“She puts material that was not even taught on the quizzes and makes them 60 percent of your grade.”
CHEM110
“ or hasn't even lectured yet.”
CHEM110

Online

The online review says quizzes and exams include material not taught, but does not clearly prove proctoring, webcam use, open-book rules, or Lockdown Browser.

Untaught Material on ExamsTough Lab Grading
“She always put something that she hasn't teach on the and .”
CHEM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“RUN, you have no business being here.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, assessment fairness, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“She moves fast during lectures and .”

⚖️

10/100

“She puts material that was not even taught on the quizzes and makes them 60 percent of your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

4/100

“Save yourself the stress and pick a better professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She does .
  • .
  • as if you know what she knows.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams and Quizzes

  • .
  • or hasn't even lectured yet.
  • She always put something that she hasn't teach on the .

Theme 3

🚩 About Student Warnings

  • .
  • Save yourself the stress and pick a better professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints are detailed, recent enough, and highly consistent.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM1106 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 3