AI Rate Professor

Law

David Sauber

LAW101 · LAW120 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
99/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and useful lectures.

Best fit · Easy A HunterOrganized lecturesOpen-note testsClear study guidesInteresting law contentHighly recommended
  • Students consistently describe the class as , and informative.
  • Grades are very attainable because and lectures or .
  • Online reviews are fewer but still strongly positive, while .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

91/100

A grades look very attainable because , and lectures that cover what is tested.

In-person reviews provide the strongest easy-A evidence through open-note tests, while but say summer reading is heavier.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

82/100

The course is content-rich but made , and clear expectations.

, while in-person reviews emphasize lectures, outlines, and clear test preparation.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

63/100

and success, but reviews also mention reasonable flexibility and .

In-person reviews mention showing up and , while online reviews .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

96/100

Every recommendation signal is positive because students , and easy to learn from.

Both formats recommend him, with and classroom experience.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

88/100

Open-note tests, clear study guides, and strong alignment between lectures and .

Format shift

, while online reviews mainly support clear guidance and simple materials.

Workload

Light

76/100

The , and exams, with only the accelerated summer course described as reading-heavy.

Format shift

Online summer reviews note more reading, while if students attend and .

Teaching experience

Excellent

91/100

Students describe his lectures as , and responsive to questions.

Format shift

, while in-person reviews emphasize interesting lectures and good question handling.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and testable lecture material rather than major assignments.

Format shift

, while online reviews do not clearly describe the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

In-person students describe interesting lectures, reasonable expectations, open-note tests, and .

Main concern

Some students mention long lectures or imperfect grade communication.

What students said

“ and you are allowed to look at your notes.”
LAW101
“as long as you show up to class you should be fine.”
23782
“ an "A"”
LAW101

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Online students , and simple but informative instruction, with summer pacing creating more reading.

Main concern

The accelerated summer version can include a lot of information and reading.

What students said

“There was a lot of information and reading because it was a 6-week course.”
LAW101
“ .”
LAW101
“ .”
LAW101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is strongly student-friendly because and clear study support.

Open-Note ExamsMultiple-Choice ExamsDetailed Study GuideLecture-Based Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

92/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews explicitly , and lectures that identify testable material.

Open-Note ExamsMultiple-Choice ExamsDetailed Study GuideLecture-Based Tests
“ and you are allowed to look at your notes.”
LAW101
“ but !”
LAW101
“ and .”
23782

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove .

Reviews do not clearly prove online exam policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

91/100

“ and concise.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

96/100

“ .”

🧪

92/100

“ and you are allowed to look at your notes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures were interesting and he is very good about answering questions.
  • He does a very good job at keeping things simple yet informational.
  • Everything you need to know is in the lectures.

Theme 2

🧪 About Exams

  • Instructor and you are allowed to look at your notes.
  • but !
  • and .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Materials

  • There was a lot of information and reading because it was a 6-week course.
  • He provides a , and lecture notes for every class.
  • Hands outlines and makes lectures easy to follow.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only 9 reviews are available and several are older, but the comments are consistent and .

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

LAW1017 reviews
237821 review
LAW1201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 4

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values