AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lora Campeau

MATHS114 · LC209 · MATH40 · STATSC1000 · MATH80 · MATH23816 · MATH155 · MATH116 · MATH60 · MATH140 · MATH114 · MATH80A · 50 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
46.94%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are already strong in math and can handle heavy independent work.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHomework HeavySelf-Teaching RequiredTest HeavyHelpful In PersonStrict Proctoring Concerns
  • Online and hybrid math sections are often described as overwhelming, independent, and weakly taught.
  • In-person reviews are more mixed, with many students praising her help while and workload.
  • Getting an A usually requires heavy practice, tutoring, and strong self-discipline rather than low effort.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students repeatedly , and steady exam preparation.

Online evidence is harsher because many students describe self-teaching, while .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The math content is often described as fast-paced, independent, and without outside help.

Online sections are described as more brutal and compressed, while but still difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

, while others say skipping or missing work makes passing unlikely.

Online attendance , while in-person attendance is often practically important for notes and exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

, but many online and hybrid students strongly warn against taking her.

, while in-person reviews are mixed to positive for students who use class notes and office hours.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

grading or , and several withdrew or earned low grades.

Format shift

Online reviews include more harsh proctoring and cheating concerns, while and few graded items.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

The dominant pattern is lots of , and compressed weekly math work.

Format shift

Online and hybrid sections are described as especially overwhelming, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

She is praised as caring and , but many online students say she relies on homework, textbooks, tutors, or TAs instead of teaching.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is much weaker, while but inconsistent.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention exams, finals, weekly tests, practice exams, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize frequent exams and , while and finals as the core grade drivers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are split, with many students finding her caring and accessible but still warning that , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that success depends on consistent practice and .

What students said

“ , but printing out the notes that she gives you and following along makes the class easier.”
MATH155
“This class requires a lot of work and a lot of studying.”
MATH114
“Professor Campeau is caring, energetic, and engaging.”
MATH155

Remote format

Online

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative because students describe heavy , and self-teaching.

Main concern

The main concern is an overwhelming online workload with little professor interaction.

What students said

“Expect NO teaching from the professor.”
MATH140
“The way this class is structured is almost impossible to keep up with.”
MATH116
“You HAVE to do the homework and read the textbook to pass this class, though.”
MATH114

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because comments describe frequent tests, strict proctoring concerns, and .

Cheat Sheet Allowed In Some Online TestsRemote Proctoring MentionedProctorio MentionedTest HeavyExam-Focused Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe , and one explicit Proctorio complaint from a review marked in person.

Practice ExamsFinal ExamProctorio MentionedTest Heavy
“The , but put in actual effort because they will always prepare for you for .”
MATH155
“She relies more on Knewton Alta than actually teaching, she also makes you .”
MATH155
“ , and has 3 exams and .”
MATH114

Online

Online reviews mention frequent exams, some cheat-sheet or open-note tests, and .

Cheat Sheet AllowedOpen-Notes MentionedRemote ProctoringProctorio ConcernWeekly Exams
“You are allowed a .”
MATH155
“The tests are due before 12 pm and are remotely proctored.”
MATH114
“Prof. Campeau accused me of cheating on an paper.”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if your aren't that great at math, it's a very independent class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ and . However, that's if you message her because she didn't interact with the class besides the .”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“Every week, you have 9 or exams you have for this small session.”

👍 Recommendation Split

38/100

“I can only recommend this hybrid class to the students who know Math.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • There is a lot of assignments but its very doable, I enjoyed this class!
  • and a lot of the homework had no thing to do with her lectures.
  • The homework and .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lecture videos so just find others online.
  • She KNOWS how to TEACH math.
  • This class was semi independent so I learned nothing from this Professor.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • 8 exams and a final.
  • The tests are due before 12 pm and are remotely proctored.
  • She only has 3 test, plus the and some .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

50

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years with consistent themes , and support.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 56
3 out of 59
2 out of 57
1 out of 513

Course coverage

MATH11415 reviews
MATH15513 reviews
MATH1408 reviews
MATH605 reviews
MATH1162 reviews
Show 7 more courses
LC2091 review
MATH238161 review
MATH401 review
MATH801 review
MATH80A1 review
MATHS1141 review
STATSC10001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

44 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 7 · A- 3

B range

11

B+ 2 · B 8 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

4

D 4

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

13

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 8 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1