AI Rate Professor

Physics

Asma Said

PHYSICS203 · PHY203 · PHYS101 · PHYS202 · PHSY101 · PHY101 · 64 lifetime ratings

AI rating
2/100
RMP rating
1.3/5
Take again
9.09%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

Avoid unless you are strong in , and and high exam pressure.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderSelf-Teaching RequiredTest HeavyPop QuizzesAvoid If Possible
  • Most students describe the class as extremely difficult, stressful, and poorly taught.
  • The dominant complaint is harsh or , and written work.
  • A few students say success is possible with , but the overall recommendation level is very low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

10/100

Even students who earned A grades describe , and barely scraping by.

The online evidence is one very negative review, while the in-person evidence repeatedly says .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

15/100

Physics is already hard, and students , and often disconnected from exams.

Nearly all evidence is in person and shows severe content difficulty, with the lone online review also negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Students mention , and .

; the online review does not clearly prove a format-specific attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

8/100

Students overwhelmingly warn others not to take her because of , and .

Both formats are negative, but the because it has 49 reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly describe extremely tough, picky, inconsistent, or .

Format shift

, while the single online review also calls her a tough grader.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Students report hours of , and exam preparation.

Format shift

The workload evidence is overwhelmingly in person, with online evidence too limited to generalize.

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Most students , and force them to teach themselves.

Format shift

In-person reviews are consistently negative, and the lone online review also says she does not teach well.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Students repeatedly describe the course as , and graded by few major items.

Format shift

, and exams; the online review does not give detailed assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews overwhelmingly describe harsh , and heavy self-teaching.

Main concern

, and severe grading pressure.

What students said

“You will have to self teach the entire semester and she is a because she feels like it.”
PHYS202
“Avg of exams is normally 30%.”
PHYS202

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and says the professor does not teach well and treats students harshly.

Main concern

The and , but it comes from only one online review.

What students said

“She does not teach well.”
PHSY101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are described as difficult, stressful, tightly graded, and central to the course grade.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesHarsh Free Response GradingLow Exam AveragesStrict Timing

Assessment risk

Strict

12/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult exams, , and , but not proctoring or open-book rules.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesHarsh Free Response GradingLow Exam AveragesStrict Timing
“Avg of exams is normally 30%.”
PHYS202
“ your grade.”
PHYS202
“Questions are not that hard themselves but you're given way too little time to do them.”
PHYS202

Online

The single online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, open-book, or Lockdown Browser rules.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You will have to self teach the entire semester and she is a because she feels like it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“Her lectures & explanations of the content is disorganized & .”

⚖️

5/100

“THE .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

8/100

“Please do yourself the favor and run from any class she teaches.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Does not teach well, it's more of a self
  • Lectures are near impossible to follow.
  • She rushes and leave students lost.

Theme 2

📉 About Exams And Grades

  • Avg of exams is normally 30%.
  • and her method of .
  • Pop-up quizzes gives heavy anxiety, expect to get 2/10.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

64

Lifetime ratings

96/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews across several years are , and high stress.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 555

Course coverage

PHYS20237 reviews
PHYS1016 reviews
PHSY1014 reviews
PHY1011 review
PHY2031 review
Show 1 more courses
PHYSICS2031 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

6

A 3 · A- 3

B range

6

B 6

C range

17

C+ 5 · C 12

D range

1

D+ 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

15

Drop/Withdrawal 5 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 7 · Rather not say 2