AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Manuel Morales

MATH112 · MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH155 · MATH60 · MATH190 · MATH140 · MATH114 · 46 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.3/5
Take again
52.17%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if , and some self-teaching in exchange for possible grading help.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTest heavyHeavy homeworkSelf-teaching requiredHelpful when approachedMixed teaching quality
  • Grades often depend heavily on exams while .
  • and clear, while others say the .
  • , and low grading scales can help students who keep working.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is possible with , and steady work, but the and not low-effort.

The online review gives no easy-A signal, while who keep up.

Is the course easy?

Standard

46/100

The math content is manageable for prepared students, but , and self-teaching make it feel harder.

Online evidence sounds harder because videos and software carry the class, while and student independence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Attendance is often important because notes, lectures, and engagement affect success, though .

The online , while in-person reviews repeatedly warn that skipping class hurts performance.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Students recommend him when they value patience and , but many warn against the , and self-teaching.

The only online review is negative, while praise and strong avoidance warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

57/100

, and low grading scales, but many students still call the because exams dominate.

Format shift

Online evidence is too thin and negative, while and harsh exam weighting.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

, and studying are repeatedly described as time-consuming and sometimes overwhelming.

Format shift

Both online and review especially calling it a truck load of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

61/100

He can be caring, funny, and clear, but many students say lectures are slow, confusing, or less useful than the .

Format shift

Online teaching is criticized through videos and software, while in-person teaching ranges .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Grades are commonly driven by midterms, finals, quizzes, and tests, while .

Format shift

The online review mentions homework but not exam structure, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show a polarizing teacher with many caring and clear moments but and .

Main concern

Students who struggle with self-teaching or .

What students said

“ as it counts towards 50% of your grade.”
MATH112
“The , but they genuinely help you grasp the material and prepare you well for Calculus II.”
MATH170
“it's honestly a points.”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only , and learning more from the software than from the professor.

Main concern

The and weak instructional support.

What students said

“Gives a truck load of hw thats due almost every other week.”
MATH112
“I learn more from the application we use than I do from him.”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually important and challenging, but .

Test HeavyChallenging ExamsRetakes Or CorrectionsMidterm And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

49/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe test-heavy courses with midterms and .

Test HeavyChallenging ExamsRetakes Or CorrectionsMidterm And Final
“Midterms 100 pts and finals were 50 pt.”
MATH112
“ .”
MATH170
“Be prepared to take 2 forms of finals and midterms.”
MATH112

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, open-book, quiz format, midterm format, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you pay attention and do your work on time it should be a pretty easy A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 46 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

61/100

“He is a great professor and cares about his students learning!”

⚖️

57/100

“The so a "75%" is a B.”

🧪

82/100

“ as it counts towards 50% of your grade.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Hands down the .
  • Not the and self-work.
  • He doesn't really know how to teach.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • He and tests taken throughout the year.
  • If you pay attention and do your work on time it should be a pretty easy A.
  • , so it is a hit or miss on how well you .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • The , and you paid for expensive apps.
  • and takes a long time to complete.
  • We were assigned a decent amount of .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

46

Recent reviews read by the AI

46

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Forty-six reviews across many years and courses give , and polarized teaching quality.

Inside 46 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 57
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH11219 reviews
MATH609 reviews
MATH807 reviews
MATH1553 reviews
MATH1703 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1142 reviews
MATH1402 reviews
MATH1901 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

39 reported outcomes

A range

16

A+ 1 · A 12 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 1 · B 9

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

9

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 6