AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Rocio Bastida

MATH141 · MATH112 · MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH250 · MATH120 · MATH150AC · MATH225 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
67/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
55.88%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take Rocio Bastida if you can handle a demanding math class with strong support but uneven course management.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear but inconsistent lecturesHeavy homeworkExtra creditUnpredictable examsCaring outside class
  • Students often praise her explanations, notes, office hours, and .
  • The biggest complaints are inconsistent , and late or canceled classes.
  • Getting an A is possible, but , and tolerance for .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

An A is realistic with , and office hours, but the exams and workload make it far from effortless.

The Easy A evidence because the single online review has no written comment.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course content is real math with heavy topics, fast pacing, and .

, while online evidence is too thin to judge content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

, but many students say class timing, cancellations, and quizzes make showing up important.

In-person reviews drive this judgment; the .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

62/100

and support, but many hesitate because the class can feel chaotic and exam-heavy.

In-person reviews are mixed but detailed, while the online review only weakly supports recommendation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

57/100

and partial credit help, but and some tough-grader comments keep grading from feeling broadly lenient.

Format shift

and partial credit often; online written evidence is unavailable.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Many students report lots of , and rushed catch-up work.

Format shift

The heavy workload signal comes from in-person reviews, with no written online workload details.

Teaching experience

Average

68/100

and care are often praised, but inconsistency, lateness, and rushed scheduling sharply reduce the experience.

Format shift

and serious course-management issues; online evidence is too limited.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades appear driven heavily by exams and and study guides used mainly for preparation.

Format shift

, and group or solo exams; online evidence is unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

explanations but heavy workload, hard exams, and inconsistent pacing.

Main concern

Students repeatedly mention late classes, canceled lectures, surprise quizzes, and .

What students said

“Caring prof & learned a lot; . But .”
MATH250
“a lot of hw btw!”
MATH250
“Rocio is great. .”
MATH225

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review has no written comment, so it only supports limited evidence of and participation.

Main concern

There is not enough written online evidence to judge the experience confidently.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report shifting group and solo formats, surprise quizzes, and hard questions despite some partial credit.

Group Exams VarySolo Exams VaryPop QuizzesCurveball QuestionsPartial Credit

Assessment risk

Varies

43/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe inconsistent group and solo exams, pop quizzes, and .

Group Exams VarySolo Exams VaryPop QuizzesCurveball Questions
“Sometimes group, sometimes solo; no consistent policy.”
MATH250
“ .”
MATH250
“The review didn't match the ”
MATH225

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A great professor who truly wants students to understand the material and clearly enjoys teaching it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and consistency. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Rocio is great. .”

📚 Workload Pressure

28/100

“a lot of hw btw!”

⚖️

43/100

“Sometimes group, sometimes solo; no consistent policy.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and teaches in an .
  • She went out of her way to make thorough and easy to understand outlines.
  • She and the course material were always rash.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • These math classes are not easy, and although her class is hard she has always been fair.
  • Her study guides do not align well with the exam and sometimes she throws .
  • Also lots of opportunities for partial and .

Theme 3

🧭 About Course Management

  • She was always late to lecture though, which added up and is probably the most grating thing.
  • Professor cancelled classes with no warning but then provided no supplemental material.
  • The overall experience was mixed. Inconsistent in managing the course.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 34 reviews span many years and repeat the same strengths and problems in detail.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 510
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 59

Course coverage

MATH25014 reviews
MATH1706 reviews
MATH2255 reviews
MATH1123 reviews
MATH150AC2 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH802 reviews
MATH1201 review
MATH1411 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

29 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 2 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

10

B+ 3 · B 7

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1