AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Patty George

MATH170 · MATH155 · CALC2 · MATH116 · MATH60 · MATH110 · MATH150 · MATH190 · CALC · MATH75 · 145 lifetime ratings

AI rating
47/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you can handle a , and use her leniency and office hours.

Best fit · Self Taught ProHeavy workloadCaring but disorganizedLenient deadlinesSelf-teaching requiredGroup work
  • Students repeatedly say the workload is heavy, especially online and in accelerated courses.
  • Many students find her kind, lenient, and accessible, but teaching clarity is inconsistent.
  • Grades can be achievable, but the course often requires self-teaching and steady time management.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

63/100

Many students earned A grades and mention leniency, but the A usually requires keeping up with a large workload rather than coasting.

Online reviews stress heavier effort, while achievable with steady work.

Is the course easy?

Standard

49/100

The math content is not always described as conceptually impossible, but disorganization and self-teaching make it harder.

Online students report more workload-driven difficulty, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

as important or threatened, while others focus on online work and do not show a strict uniform policy.

In-person reviews include stronger attendance concerns, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

47/100

and leniency, but many warn against her because of workload and .

Online recommendations are weaker due to workload complaints, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

Students often mention , and chances to recover grades.

Format shift

Both formats mention leniency, but online students still complain about workload and .

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Reviews repeatedly describe lots of homework, weekly assignments, handwritten work, notes, worksheets, and time pressure.

Format shift

Online workload is described as more overwhelming, while but sometimes manageable.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is often caring and helpful, but many students describe lectures as .

Format shift

Online reviews lean more negative on organization, while and strong criticism.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Grades appear to combine homework, worksheets, quizzes, tests, group work, and .

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize assignments and quizzes, while , and take-home exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

36 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many praising her kindness and leniency while and .

Main concern

Teaching clarity varies, and many students still report lots of homework.

What students said

“Lots of , and worksheets but its pretty achievable.”
MATH170
“You pretty much have to teach yourself the material.”
MATH150

Remote format

Online

14 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are more negative about extreme workload, disorganization, and , though some students praise her care and leniency.

Main concern

Online workload can feel overwhelming and .

What students said

“so much work its unbelievable”
MATH155
“feels like you have to teach yourself. ”
MATH170

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is mixed but often student-friendly, with alongside some tough tests.

Take-Home ExamsGroup TestsOpen Internet For FinalTests Can Be Tough

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

78/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

pages, fair tests, and some very hard tests.

Take-Home ExamsGroup TestsFormula Pages AllowedFair TestsHard Tests
“the and she gives you a few days to do it.”
MATH190
“ .”
CALC2

Online

Online reviews mention internet use, peer collaboration on the final, whole-class work on tests and quizzes, and tougher tests in some sections.

Open Internet For FinalPeer CollaborationGroup TestsTough Tests
“she allowed us to use the internet and encouraged us to work with and even the final.”
MATH155
“you'll usually work with the ”
MATH170

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She's an awesome professor. , and focused on the student's success. You must do all if not most of the work to get good grades.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“The amount of work you have to do in this class is unreal.”

❤️ Leniency And Care

70/100

“She is an amazing professor, and extremely lenient.”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“Very sweet person but can't teach.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • so much work its unbelievable
  • The amount of work you have to do in this class is unreal.
  • , but you can do it in groups too.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • You pretty much have to teach yourself the material.
  • Love this prof! .
  • she's a nice person but a very bad and .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Grades And Flexibility

  • she is very lenient with late work.
  • She gives you a lot of opportunities to get high grades.
  • Honestly not hard to get a good grade in her class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

145

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with consistent themes around workload, leniency, and uneven teaching.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 535
4 out of 515
3 out of 522
2 out of 529
1 out of 544

Course coverage

MATH17017 reviews
MATH1507 reviews
MATH1556 reviews
MATH1906 reviews
CALC25 reviews
Show 5 more courses
CALC3 reviews
MATH1162 reviews
MATH602 reviews
MATH1101 review
MATH751 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

19

A+ 2 · A 15 · A- 2

B range

11

B+ 4 · B 5 · B- 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

10

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 3 · Rather not say 3