AI Rate Professor

English

Frank Mixson

LIT · ENG230B · ENG230 · ENG100230A · ENGL100 · AMERICANLIT · ENGLISH · ENGL221A · MHID · 195 lifetime ratings

AI rating
0/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
3.15%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

unless you are fully prepared for , and harsh grading.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderHeavy workloadUnclear instructionsSelf-teachingNot recommended
  • Reviews overwhelmingly warn against taking him because of , and heavy work.
  • Students repeatedly say they had to teach themselves and received little support or feedback.
  • The online evidence is also strongly , and GPA risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears extremely difficult because many reviews report , and heavy work.

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

8/100

The course experience is difficult mainly because , and students feel .

Online reviews mention self-teaching and , while and assignment confusion.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

35/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though some mention quizzes and participation pressure.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students almost uniformly because of , and unclear teaching.

Both online and .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

4/100

Reviews repeatedly call him a tough or and report low scores, failed grades, and little flexibility.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews describe harsh outcomes, with in-person evidence much larger.

Workload

Overwhelming

2/100

Students report weekly readings, quizzes, essays, discussion boards, tight deadlines, and extreme time demands.

Format shift

Online and .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Students repeatedly describe unclear instruction, lack of examples, delayed or absent communication, and having to teach themselves.

Format shift

Both formats are negative, and online reviews specifically emphasize self-teaching.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Reviews , and a final project, so assessment is spread across multiple formats.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most assessment detail, while , and tests.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, emphasizing harsh grading, unclear requirements, heavy workload, and poor teaching support.

Main concern

The main risk is failing despite large effort because , and support are described as poor.

What students said

“ YOU WILL EVER HAVE”
AMERICANLIT
“There is a lot of , and .”
AMERICANLIT
“ .”
AMERICANLIT

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe a very poor experience with , and failed outcomes.

Main concern

Students say the online class risks GPA damage because help and clarity are lacking.

What students said

“Horrible as an online professor.”
AMERICANLIT
“Basically you are teaching yourself so if you have other classes.”
AMERICANLIT

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Quiz And Exam BasedHard GradingReviews do not clearly prove proctoring

Assessment risk

Strict

20/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention quizzes, exams, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

QuizzesExamsFinal ProjectHard Grading
“no real or .”
AMERICANLIT
“30% of your grade goes to the " "”
AMERICANLIT
“There is a lot of , and .”
AMERICANLIT

Online

Online reviews mention papers and tests but do not clearly prove .

Tests MentionedReviews do not clearly prove proctoring
“ .”
AMERICANLIT

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ YOU WILL EVER HAVE”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“Youtube was our professor.”

📚 Workload

2/100

“I'm actually spending 40 hours and that's kinda insane.”

⚖️

4/100

“VERY VERY strict with grading, if you make one small mistake ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesnt really teach, rather answers your question w/ another question.
  • He could not give examples to help students understand the lesson.
  • 95% of lectures are unrelated to class material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 50-60% on most assignments which brought down grades.
  • There is a lot of , and .
  • Getting definitions for things that will be tested on was like pulling teeth.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • Stay far away if you do not want to mess up your gpa.
  • .
  • .!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

195

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

There are 50 reviews with highly consistent negative themes, but credibility is reduced by repetition, extreme wording, and some noisy or duplicated comments.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 550
4 out of 58
3 out of 54
2 out of 59
1 out of 5124

Course coverage

AMERICANLIT35 reviews
ENG100230A5 reviews
ENGL1003 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENG2301 review
Show 4 more courses
ENG230B1 review
ENGL221A1 review
LIT1 review
MHID1 review

Reported outcomes

F results lead the reported letter grades.

50 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

4

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 2

F

39

F 39

No letter grade reported

7

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Rather not say 2