AI Rate Professor

Engineering

Allen Bakalyar

ENGR235 · ENGR112 · ENGR110 · 14 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you want a and helps you learn real-world skills.

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring mentorExtra creditReal-world engineeringClear supportFair grading
  • , and supportive teaching.
  • Engineering material can be hard, but he gives , redos, help, and .
  • Online and , though online evidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

An A is very realistic because he gives , redos, and support, but students still need to keep up with difficult engineering work.

In-person evidence clearly supports high reward for effort, while online evidence is positive but .

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The professor makes material understandable, but , and quizzes are still genuinely challenging.

, while online reviews do not give enough course-difficulty specifics.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and participation, but reviews do not show a .

In-person comments encourage class preparation and participation, while online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

99/100

Students recommend him almost unanimously because , and focused on student success.

Both online and providing much richer support.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

because students repeatedly mention , redos, forgiveness, and chances to succeed.

Format shift

, while online reviews mention but give fewer details.

Workload

Moderate

54/100

The workload is moderate because assignments and tests can be difficult, but and support reduce the pressure.

Format shift

, and quizzes, while online reviews do not describe workload clearly.

Teaching experience

Excellent

97/100

Students describe him as , and one of .

Format shift

Both formats praise him, with quality.

Assessment method

Balanced

66/100

Assessment appears balanced across homework, tests, quizzes, projects, assignments, participation, and .

Format shift

, and assignments, while online reviews do not specify assessment structure.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews strongly praise his support, real-world examples, , and fair chances to recover grades.

Main concern

The , and quizzes can still be difficult if students fall behind.

What students said

“allows redo of assignments as he simply wants you to succeed; tons of , makes you focus on material and not the grade.”
ENGR112
“The lecture is easy to understand, the , and .”
ENGR235

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are very positive but brief, emphasizing care, accessibility, and strong recommendation.

Main concern

Online evidence is limited and does not describe assessment details clearly.

What students said

“The signing up for his classes!!!!”
ENGR235
“Amazing Professor.”
ENGR235

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes are standard-to-difficult, but and redo opportunities make the overall assessment experience more forgiving.

TestsQuizzesDifficult HomeworkExtra CreditRedo Opportunities

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention difficult tests and quizzes, but .

TestsQuizzesDifficult Homework
“the , and .”
ENGR235
“Do the homework and participate in class, and you should be okay.”
ENGR235

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam, Lockdown .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Top 3 professors .”

Voice snapshots generated from 14 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

97/100

“He's a fantastic lecturer, makes sure you understand the material; allows redo of assignments as he simply wants you to succeed; tons of , makes you focus on material and not the grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

99/100

“The signing up for his classes!!!!”

⚖️ Effort And Reward

84/100

“He's quite forgiving and understanding, though he won't just give out "easy A's"; you get the grade you deserve.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • His experience as an actual engineer really shows.
  • He prepares the material so that you can understand it when the school year is over to use in the real world.
  • His lectures are okay but the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • He gives students chances to succeed and offers .
  • The lecture is easy to understand, the , and .
  • Come to class prepared and you will do great.

Theme 3

❤️ About Support

  • He cares , and he really just wants you all to succeed.
  • When I didnt understand something, he helped me understand it.
  • He is an extremely caring and motivational professor that wishes nothing but success for his students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

14

Recent reviews read by the AI

14

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because the reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample size is only 14 with just 2 online reviews.

Inside 14 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 512
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENGR2358 reviews
ENGR1125 reviews
ENGR1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

12

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values