AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Holly Gregg

WGS202 · WGS101 · SOC202 · SOC101 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
47.06%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you are ready for , and possible frustration over feedback.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderReading HeavyInconsistent FeedbackPolarized ExperienceStronger Older Reviews
  • Recent online reviews are much harsher than and communication.
  • Students often describe heavy reading, discussions, and .
  • In-person evidence is limited but plagiarism concern.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

39/100

Getting an A is possible, but , and effort that does not always feel rewarded.

Online reviews drive most Easy A concerns, while and mixed.

Is the course easy?

Standard

51/100

The subject matter is often basic, but reading, discussions, papers, and the content itself.

Online reviews mention basic concepts but high workload, while in-person comments are mostly positive with little content-difficulty detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Participation and timely discussion work matter, but reviews do .

Online evidence emphasizes deadlines and participation, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Recent students often advise choosing someone else because and .

Online recommendation is weak in recent reviews, while .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Many students call her a and complain about lost points, plagiarism or AI accusations, and .

Format shift

Online reviews contain most strict-grading complaints, with .

Workload

Heavy

33/100

Reviews , and studying a lot to keep up.

Format shift

Online reviews describe heavier recurring workload, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Older students praise her, but recent reviews often and .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is highly polarized and recently negative, while in-person comments are mostly positive but sparse.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Comments , and written assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats point mainly to assignment-based assessment, with stronger evidence from online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and describe her as engaging and understanding, but one recent review raises a .

Main concern

and one plagiarism accusation complaint.

What students said

“she accuses you of plagrisim and AI even if you put in the .”
WGS101
“She's an and helps you out in anyway she can.”
SOC101
“She is truly amazing!”
SOC101

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are mixed but recent , and limited understanding.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Horrible professor. .”
WGS101
“All i have to say is .. pick someone else”
SOC202
“I took her fall 2020 and her class was the easiest.”
WGS202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a specific exam format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, midterm format, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly ProvenAssignment-Based Course Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible professor. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ ”

⚖️

24/100

“This class is hard for me. I get 14 out of 20 discussion points and she is a and I try so hard to pass this class and I struggle.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

36/100

“All i have to say is .. pick someone else”

Theme 1

⚖️

  • Horrible professor. .
  • she is a and I try so hard to pass this class and I struggle.
  • and . !

Theme 2

📚 About Workload

  • and reading.
  • Pull all nighters if you need to
  • Try not to miss any of the if you can.

Theme 3

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's an and helps you out in anyway she can.
  • She is truly amazing!
  • Does not care if you're struggling

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen reviews across several years provide detailed but strongly time-dependent evidence, with recent online reviews much more negative.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 52
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

WGS1018 reviews
SOC2026 reviews
SOC1012 reviews
WGS2021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 1 · A 6 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2