AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Julie Trieu

CHEM110 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you are new to chemistry or , because the class demands strong self-study.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerFast-paced lecturesHard to followHeavy homeworkStrict lab expectationsMixed grading fairness
  • Most negative reviews say lectures move too fast and are , especially for students new to chemistry.
  • Workload and exams are a major concern, with reports of lots of , and lab exams.
  • A few students say she is fair, flexible, and helpful, but the dominant pattern is high difficulty and low recommendation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but comments , and significant self-study.

Online reviews make the A feel especially hard because of timed exams, while and extra-credit offsets.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Chemistry content is made , and frequent reports that students must teach themselves.

Both formats describe the course as fast and , with online comments adding difficult timed tests.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

lab was crucial and could not be missed or made up.

missed, while in-person reviews mention participation but give less policy detail.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

27/100

Most students do not recommend her because the lectures are fast, support feels limited, and .

Both online reviews are negative, and in-person reviews are mixed but lean negative overall.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students call her fair or not harsh, but more recent comments report , and .

Format shift

Online reviews describe grading as unfair and difficult, while comments.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and the need for heavy studying.

Format shift

Both formats support a heavy workload, with online reviews emphasizing lab reports and exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

31/100

Reviews often say she lectures too fast, is hard to understand, and can seem annoyed when students ask questions.

Format shift

Both formats report communication and pacing issues, though a few in-person students praise her fairness and care.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine homework, lab reports, exams, quizzes, and .

Format shift

Online reviews specifically mention lab reports and two cumulative lab exams, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

but mostly warn that the , and beginners may struggle without self-teaching.

Main concern

Fast lectures and prior chemistry strength.

What students said

“Class moves very quickly”
CHEM110
“Chem isnt common knowledge so you will have to study if you want an A.”
CHEM110

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are negative, citing , and difficult timed exams.

Main concern

Students report difficult exams and limited support when they ask questions.

What students said

“Professor has a very thick accent and is hard to understand.”
CHEM110
“ exams”
CHEM110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and cumulative lab exams, with no clear proof of open-book or proctoring policies.

Difficult Timed ExamsCumulative Lab ExamsPractice Exams Not Enough

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and exams but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, quiz, midterm, or .

Difficult ExamsTests Not Like Study Guides
“ ”
CHEM110
“Chem isnt common knowledge so you will have to study if you want an A.”
CHEM110

Online

Online reviews mention difficult timed tests and cumulative lab exams, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Difficult Timed ExamsCumulative Lab Exams
“we were only given 45 mins to finish the tests”
CHEM110
“ and 2 cumulative lab exams.”
CHEM110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Her lectures are wayyy too fast for my liking.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Clarity

31/100

“She goes very fast, I had to ask her to slow down”

📚 Workload Load

22/100

“she gives an INSANE amount of homework”

🧪

32/100

“ exams”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lecture Style

  • Class moves very quickly and the teacher has a heavy accent, which makes it .
  • The way she teaches is so fast-pacing
  • Goes way too fast and she has thick accent which can make it difficult to understand her.

Theme 2

📈

  • we were only given 45 mins to finish the tests
  • Chem isnt common knowledge so you will have to study if you want an A.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support & Workload

  • Gets annoyed when you ask questions and does not like to help.
  • she gives an INSANE amount of homework
  • She clearly cares about teaching and she is very flexible on due dates.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

The 12 reviews are recent enough and detailed, but the sample is modest and includes a few strongly conflicting experiences.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

CHEM11012 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 1