AI Rate Professor

Communication

Rachel Judy

COMM314 · COMM1000 · COMM132 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
52.94%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if the section has strong classroom structure, but be cautious with online sections because workload and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderParticipation mattersLots of homeworkCaring in personOnline communication issues
  • Online reviews are strongly negative, citing strict , and poor support.
  • In-person COMM-314 reviews are much more positive, describing engaging lectures, care, and reasonable pacing.
  • Grades are possible, but the experience depends heavily on format and course section.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

43/100

An A can happen in some in-person sections, but , and textbook dependence make it effort-heavy overall.

In-person reviews include easy-A claims when students show up and read, while online and heavy workload.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

The material is not always intellectually hard, but , and participation demands raise the practical difficulty.

In-person COMM-314 feels more organized and manageable, while online COMM132 is described as unusually demanding for an online class.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation appear strict, with and online daily participation expectations.

, while online evidence says students must participate every day.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendations split by format, with strong in-person praise but and communication.

Online reviews mostly advise against taking her, while in-person COMM-314 reviews often recommend her strongly.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many students call her a tough or very strict grader, especially online where small formatting or .

Format shift

Online reviews repeatedly describe harsh grading, while but and quizzes.

Workload

Heavy

26/100

Students report daily participation, lots of , and projects that make the workload heavy.

Format shift

Online workload is described as constant and frustrating, while but still participation- and quiz-heavy.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching quality is sharply split, with caring and engaging in-person reviews offset by severe online complaints about communication and support.

Format shift

In-person reviews are much stronger, while online reviews repeatedly criticize responsiveness, professionalism, and assignment structure.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment appears , and written assignments rather than relying only on exams.

Format shift

, and projects, while online sections emphasize daily assignments, participation, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mostly positive for COMM-314, praising engagement, care, and reasonable pacing, though a few COMM132 reviews are sharply negative.

Main concern

, and textbook use matter in person.

What students said

“ and you need the textbook.”
COMM-314
“Really fun and engaging class, very positive energy and .”
COMM-314

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about strict grading, heavy daily participation, delayed responses, and .

Main concern

and weak communication.

What students said

“She makes you do something EVERYDAY which takes away the ”
COMM132
“ .”
Comm1000

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes and one no-internet rule, but they do not clearly prove online proctoring, open-book exams, webcam use, or .

Quiz HeavyNo Internet MentionedParticipation-Based WorkReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and one no-internet rule, but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring.

Quiz HeavyNo Internet Mentioned
“The class is quiz-heavy, but nothing that isn't reasonable.”
COMM-314
“She does not allow the use of internet, but she teaches well and knows her material.”
COMM-314

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam use, Lockdown Browser, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

Daily ParticipationAssignments Heavy
“She makes you do something EVERYDAY”
COMM132
“The got to the final project.”
COMM132

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Had her online, may be different in person.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and teaching style. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Split

50/100

“Had her online, may be different in person.”

⚖️

28/100

“ , if you don't actively use the textbook she will, give you a zero.”

👍 In-Person Recommendation

48/100

“She brings a lot of energy to the classroom and cares about all of her students inside and outside of class.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Experience

  • .
  • .
  • She makes you do something EVERYDAY

Theme 2

👨‍🏫

  • Professor Judy had some very interesting lectures that were very up-to-date and relevant to today's communication style.
  • She makes class engaging and fun even when the textbook can lean on the dryer side.
  • Really fun and engaging class, very positive energy and .

Theme 3

📈 About Grades & Workload

  • , if you don't actively use the textbook she will, give you a zero.
  • Do the reading and show up, that's really all you need to do.
  • There aren't a lot of assignments in her class, so .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 17 recent reviews with a clear and repeated split between online frustration and in-person praise.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 58

Course coverage

COMM1329 reviews
COMM-3147 reviews
Comm10001 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

17 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 2 · A- 2

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C+ 2

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2