AI Rate Professor

Art

Donna Robinson

ART15 · ART150 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you want a relaxed art elective or easy A, but consider her if you are serious about ceramics and can handle strict expectations.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderParticipation requiredHeavy studio workloadStrict deadlinesNot beginner friendly
  • Most students describe the class as stricter and .
  • Beginners struggle because .
  • Students who already care about ceramics and follow directions closely can benefit from her expertise and feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students explicitly say this is not an easy A and , and careful documentation.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The course is hard for beginners because technical , and studio time create a .

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Attendance and participation appear functionally required because students say skipping class or .

and lab expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students do not recommend her because strictness, workload, and treatment of students outweigh the .

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Many reviews call her a and emphasize strict deadlines, participation, documentation, and careful instruction-following.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and outside-class effort.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

She is knowledgeable and gives feedback, but many students describe her as .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on studio projects, classwork, documentation, deadlines, and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

useful expertise but heavy expectations, fast deadlines, and a tough experience for beginners.

Main concern

The , and substantial lab time outside class.

What students said

“This is not an easy-A class.”
ART150
“Be prepared to work very hard.”
ART150
“Be ready to be in ....”
ART15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mostly focus on projects and lab work, and comment saying exams were harder than expected.

Project HeavySome Exams MentionedNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, open-book rules, proctoring, webcam use, or closed-book requirements.

Some Exams MentionedProject Heavy
“The this elective.”
ART15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is not an easy-A class. Be prepared to work very hard.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and studio expectations. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ but .”

⚖️

22/100

“Very difficult professor.”

🧱 Workload Demand

25/100

“you will spend a lot of time outside of class to finish projects”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • , and rough.
  • she had a notable lack of patience for some students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is not an easy-A class.
  • Be prepared to work very hard.
  • .

Theme 3

🧪 About Studio Expectations

  • You need to show up to class and come after hours to the decent grade.
  • Be ready to be in ....
  • TAKE PICS of everything you

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven in-person reviews across several years give consistent , and beginner difficulty.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ART1509 reviews
ART152 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 2

B range

3

B 3

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1