AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Marie Valentine

MATH170 · MATH116 · MATH114 · MATH112 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
37.5%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

if you , and keep up with fast-paced math expectations.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyFast pacedHeavy homeworkMixed supportStrict exams
  • Most recent in-person math reviews are strongly negative, with , and weak support.
  • The single online review is much more positive and describes curves, , recorded lectures, and .
  • Students who are already independent and strong in math are more likely to survive the course than students needing close guidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Grades can improve with , but comments show the A requires heavy effort and strong test performance.

Online evidence is more generous, while and harder grade pressure.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The , and assumes prior knowledge, making it hard for students who struggle with math.

The online review still calls the class hard, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

In-person reviews mention sign-in sheets and class dependence, while the online .

; the single online review does not clearly prove a flexible policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Recommendation is low because and high dropout rates, despite one strong online endorsement.

Online evidence is positive, but and more numerous.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

as heavily weighted and memorization-based, though the online review mentions curves, , and two exam attempts.

Format shift

Online grading appears more forgiving, while and exam-driven.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention lots of , and fast pacing.

Format shift

Both formats describe difficulty, but and pressure.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Some students find her caring and helpful, but many describe her as disengaged, fast-paced, and likely to leave students self-teaching.

Format shift

The online review is highly positive, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Multiple reviews state the course is test-heavy, with exams and a grade.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews mention exams, but .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, emphasizing test-heavy , and limited connection with students.

Main concern

while and heavy workload.

What students said

“You're better off taking an online class and being self-independent than taking her class.”
MATH116
“No notes allowed on the .”
MATH116
“Really fast paced and has certain expectations of what you should already know.”
MATH114

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is positive and says she provided recorded lectures, , and two exam attempts.

Main concern

The class was still hard despite the support.

What students said

“This class was hard ngl however she really tried to do as much as she can.”
MATH116
“gave you TWO tries on the exams”
MATH116

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Overall exam risk is high because in-person reviews describe heavily weighted exams and no-note memorization, while the but .

Test HeavyNo Notes AllowedHeavily Weighted ExamsTwo Exam Attempts Online

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

no notes allowed, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or closed-book rules beyond the no-notes policy.

No Notes AllowedHeavily Weighted ExamsTest Heavy
“4 exams throughout the semester which are worth 64% of the grade, and the final exam is worth 20%.”
MATH170
“No notes allowed on the .”
MATH116
“She does reviews for tests but not for quizzes.”
MATH114

Online

The online review , but it does not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or proctoring.

Two Exam AttemptsTest Heavy
“gave you TWO tries on the exams”
MATH116

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You're better off taking an online class and being self-independent than taking her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“If you want to teach yourself all semester long then go ahead and .”

🧪

25/100

“No notes allowed on the .”

👍 Online Support

38/100

“She curved grades, gave , had fill in notes, gave lectures which are recorded”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Not student-friendly, unwilling to connect and engage with myself and other students.
  • .
  • Really fast paced and has certain expectations of what you should already know.

Theme 2

📈

  • No notes allowed on the .
  • gave you TWO tries on the exams

Theme 3

📚 About Workload & Support

  • She gives a lot of homework but she gives you a lot of time to finish it.
  • All lectures are posted on a slide show and most of the .
  • 2/3's of the class dropped.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews cover multiple math courses and formats, with but only one online review.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 52
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH1163 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
MATH1142 reviews
MATH1701 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2