AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Dara Worrel

MATH40 · MATH80 · MATH20 · MATH155 · MATH60 · MATH150 · MATH140 · MATH114 · MATH80A · 42 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
6.25%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself math, managing strict deadlines, and relying on tutoring or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-teaching riskHeavy homeworkTest heavyStrict systemsMixed teaching quality
  • Recent online reviews are strongly negative, often citing self-teaching, poor communication, Proctorio, and heavy workload.
  • Older in-person reviews are much , and fair tests.
  • The overall recommendation is very low because the recent experience appears risky, especially in online or semi-independent formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A requires sustained homework, test performance, self-teaching, and deadline control, with , and frustration.

Online evidence is much harsher and more self-directed, while older in-person evidence includes easier paths when students study and use review sheets.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

The math content may be manageable for prepared students, but fast pacing, independent learning systems, and weak support make the course feel challenging.

Online sections are harder because they rely on independent platforms, while semi-independent courses.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

40/100

Attendance and pacing policies vary by course, but several reviews mention drops, strict progress expectations, or needing class and tutoring to keep up.

Online reviews emphasize deadlines and drops, while on the course.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Recent students largely discourage taking her because they report little teaching, poor communication, heavy workload, and harsh course systems.

Online recommendation evidence is strongly negative, while and later complaints.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students mention , and limited slack despite some older reports of fair tests.

Format shift

Online reviews report stricter systems and poor support, while in-person reviews are and .

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Many reviews describe lots of homework, exhaustive assignments, test-heavy grading, paid platforms, and heavy self-teaching.

Format shift

Online workload is described as especially heavy and platform-driven, while but , and exams.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Teaching quality is sharply split, with older students praising clear explanations but recent students often saying she is absent, unhelpful, or relies on tutors and systems.

Format shift

Online teaching experience is mostly poor in recent reviews, while and serious complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

86/100

Reviews repeatedly , and grades based largely on test performance.

Format shift

Online sections mention Proctorio and multiple exams, while exam-score-based progress.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with many older positive comments about clear teaching but several , and semi-independent structure.

Main concern

The in-person experience varies sharply by course and era, with semi-independent sections requiring strong self-direction.

What students said

“ ! and so much!”
MATH40
“This class ”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing Proctorio, self-teaching, poor , and limited instructor presence.

Main concern

Students report that online sections can feel unsupported, proctored, and heavily dependent on external platforms or tutoring.

What students said

“ and self teaching.”
MATH140
“Forget asking for help. ”
MATH150

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews , and harsh progress consequences.

ProctorioTest HeavyExam BasedStrict Progress Rules

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring details.

Exam BasedFinal Worth 200 PointsTest HeavyQuizzes
“ ”
MATH114
“This class ”
MATH60

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention Proctorio in multiple sections, but do not clearly prove open-book status, webcam details, or Lockdown Browser use.

ProctorioRemotely Proctored ExamsFour ExamsTest Heavy
“This class uses proctorio for testing.”
MATH114
“There is an exhaustive amount of assignments and .”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and self teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 42 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and mixed teaching history. Credibility rating: High.

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

18/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“There is an exhaustive amount of assignments and .”

👨‍🏫 Teaching Split

35/100

“Professor Worrel is one of the . and gives numerous examples.”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Format

  • It's all independent and that is what caught me by surprise.
  • They force you to buy a subscription to be able to access the class. Then never speak to you again.
  • They won't help, just leave everything for their TA.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • This class uses proctorio for testing. Lots of homework.
  • This class is all based on exam scores if you don't pass an exam you need and and pass the exam.
  • slack at all.

Theme 3

🔀 About Mixed Teaching Experience

  • and gives numerous examples.
  • Great teacher. Made math so easy to understand.
  • Doesnt teach students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

42

Recent reviews read by the AI

42

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 42 reviews over a long time span, with strong recent consistency about online problems but .

Inside 42 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 517
4 out of 55
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH4011 reviews
MATH607 reviews
MATH1146 reviews
MATH806 reviews
MATH1504 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH1403 reviews
MATH1553 reviews
MATH201 review
MATH80A1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

5

B 5

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Rather not say 2