AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Thomas Lewandowski

MATH112 · MATH170 · MATH80 · MATH116 · MATH60 · MATH150 · MATH140 · MATH80B · MATH22395 · MATH80A · 83 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.4/5
Take again
85%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep up with homework and test preparation.

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear math explanationsHelpful office supportTest-focused gradingHomework mattersMostly fair curves
  • and makes difficult topics more manageable.
  • Grades often depend on a , so .
  • Online and , but online reviews are more mixed about test alignment and interaction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

An A is realistic with and test practice, but the .

Online reviews mention practice tests and platform work, while , and test performance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students say he makes math easier to understand, though calculus and statistics can still feel difficult or fast-paced.

Online students rely more on videos and practice systems, while and questions.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as formally mandatory, but students repeatedly say showing up and taking notes are important.

, while online reviews emphasize keeping up with due dates.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him because , and .

Both formats are recommended overall, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

73/100

in several classes, and often gives clear test preparation.

Format shift

, and cheat sheets more often than online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and sometimes heavy, but students usually describe it as useful rather than unreasonable.

Format shift

Online reviews mention Pearson or platform assignments, while and random collection.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Students consistently describe him as , and willing to answer questions.

Format shift

, while online teaching feedback is positive but has a few complaints about interaction and test alignment.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and finals, with several reviews saying only a few items determine the grade.

Format shift

Both formats are test-heavy, with online work often routed through Pearson or similar systems.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students strongly value his clear lectures, willingness to answer questions, and .

Main concern

because many classes are graded by only a few tests and .

What students said

“He and break them down to help you understand.”
MATH170
“The grading is only based on 4 homework assignments and 4 test, so you have to do well on the .”
MATH116

Remote format

Online

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students usually praise his videos, organization, and reachable support, but a few found the class hard or poorly aligned with tests.

Main concern

Online success depends on staying current with platform work and using practice material carefully.

What students said

“His videos are great and he lectures well, he uses Pearson for his class, and the but it's almost 1 to 1 to the so if you can do the practice you'll be fine.”
MATH150
“ ! he breaks everything down easily, but when it is time to take the anything!”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam policy varies by course, with some student-friendly cheat sheets or open-book exams but and .

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsCheat Sheets In Some ClassesOpen-Book Exams In Some ClassesNo Notes In Some ClassesTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

68/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and some no-note tests, so exam friendliness depends on the class.

Cheat Sheets Allowed In Some ClassesSome Open-Book ExamsSome No-Note TestsFew High-Value Tests
“Some of the .”
MATH112
“Notes aren't allowed for tests so make sure you have processes memorized.”
MATH170

Online

Online , and no late work in one class, but they do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Practice Tests Similar To ExamsPlatform Quizzes And TestsNo Late Work In One Review
“the but it's almost 1 to 1 to the ”
MATH150
“ , and .”
MATH112

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He and break them down to help you understand.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“He and break them down to help you understand.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

86/100

“If you are looking to take any Calc .”

⚖️

73/100

“The grading is only based on 4 homework assignments and 4 test, so you have to do well on the .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He repeatedly explained the same thing for students to understand.
  • He is by far the .
  • He made math so much easier to understand and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • !
  • Doing all the the quizzes and tests.
  • so try to .

Theme 3

📝 About Exams And Homework

  • There was about 4 exams and he allows cheat .
  • Notes aren't allowed for tests so make sure you have processes memorized.
  • Theres also a lot of hw but its not too bad just make sure to complete.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

83

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 50 reviews across many years and courses, with , and exam-heavy grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 512
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH11212 reviews
MATH809 reviews
MATH1166 reviews
MATH80A6 reviews
MATH1404 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH1704 reviews
MATH604 reviews
MATH1502 reviews
MATH80B2 reviews
MATH223951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

42 reported outcomes

A range

17

A+ 6 · A 10 · A- 1

B range

14

B+ 7 · B 6 · B- 1

C range

2

C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

8

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 2 · Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Rather not say 1