AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Matthew Mayock

PHIL109 · PHIL104 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
76.92%
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Mayock is an excellent online pick for students who can keep up with reading and .

Best fit · Easy A HunterEasy online classLenient late workReading heavyLate gradingPassionate teacher
  • Online students generally find Mayock's class easy, straightforward, and highly lenient with late work.
  • The main drawback is delayed grading, which .
  • The class usually involves weekly readings and discussions, so falling behind is the main practical risk.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

WalkInThePark

94/100

Online reviews describe easy assignments, many A , and very lenient late penalties.

Online evidence strongly supports an easy A, while the .

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Students say the assignments and instructions are easy to follow, though weekly readings and .

Online reviews describe the course as easy and informative, while the and .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

72/100

Online work appears flexible with extensions, but the .

Online and late work, while the only in-person review suggests daily participation expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students recommend him for kindness, passion, easy structure, and .

Online students mostly recommend him, while the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

95/100

Students report , and grades rarely dropping below 80 percent even when work is late.

Format shift

Online reviews provide strong evidence of generous grading, while .

Workload

Light

78/100

The class has regular readings and discussions, but as straightforward and not too difficult.

Format shift

Online workload is light to moderate with weekly reading, while the in-person review gives little workload detail beyond participation.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Most online students describe him as , and informative, but and one poor in-person review reduce the score.

Format shift

Online teaching evidence is strong and positive, while the .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear , and assignments rather than exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize discussions and rare quizzes, while the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review is negative and , and awkward participation grading.

Main concern

In-person evidence is too limited but and .

What students said

“ but there's not enough time for everyone to talk after he talks.”
PHIL109

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

Online reviews are very positive overall, , and a passionate instructor.

Main concern

The biggest and .

What students said

“The and easy to comprehend.”
PHIL-104
“he hasn't graded a single thing and theres one more week left of the course”
PHIL-104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show few easy quizzes and , but they do not clearly prove open-book, proctoring, webcam, midterm, final, or Lockdown Browser policies.

Rare Easy QuizzesDiscussion PostsNo Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The but does not clearly prove exam format, open-book rules, closed-book rules, proctoring, midterms, or finals.

Daily Participation
“ but there's not enough time for everyone to talk after he talks.”
PHIL109

Online

Online reviews mention rare easy notebook quizzes and , but do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, midterms, or finals.

Rare Easy Notebook QuizDiscussion PostsFew Quizzes
“Every week there would be 1 or 2 discussions and sometimes, in a rare moon, there is a 10 question easy notebook quiz.”
PHIL-104
“ .”
PHIL-104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very kind and and never gives you a grade below an 80% even if it is very late.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“His knowledge is amazing, and he presents everything in a way that is easy to understand.”

🎁 Easy A Potential

94/100

“The and easy to comprehend.”

⏳

55/100

“he hasn't graded a single thing and theres one more week left of the course”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's really passionate about the subject.
  • He is a , and .
  • His knowledge is amazing, and he presents everything in a way that is easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • never gives you a grade below an 80% even if it is very late.
  • He is very lenient with late work with very little deduction to your grade.
  • otherwise it was an easy class.

Theme 3

📚 About Workload And Feedback

  • There is lots of reading, and most of the .
  • There are 1-2 discussions every week based on the reading.
  • only recently on finals week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 13 reviews include many recent online comments with consistent themes, though .

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

PHIL-10411 reviews
PHIL1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

11 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 1 · A 7 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2