AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Maria Torres

MATH · MATHMATH · MATH40 · MATH6080A · MATH80 · MATH60 · MATH80B · MATH114 · MATH104 · MATH80A · 86 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you are comfortable with strict grading, test-heavy math, and learning actively from lectures and notes.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerPolarizing teacherTough graderTest heavyClear for some studentsAttendance matters
  • Reviews are sharply split between and students who say she is harsh or confusing.
  • The main risk is strict grading on quizzes and correct answers.
  • She can work for self-driven math students who attend, study notes, and ask for help, but she is risky for students needing leniency.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible for strong, consistent students, but , and .

The single online review is very negative, while but only with heavy studying and tolerance for .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The math content can be clear for some students, but many , and little room for error.

Online evidence is too thin to generalize, while and polarizing course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Many reviews warn that skipping or arriving late hurts performance, and some mention missed or .

, while in-person reviews repeatedly say attendance is essential.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends heavily on the student because some praise her clear math teaching while many .

The online review is negative, and and courses.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students frequently describe her as a process errors.

Format shift

The online review complains about failing, while .

Workload

Heavy

34/100

, but , and test preparation make the workload feel heavy.

Format shift

Online workload detail is weak, while , and studying.

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Teaching quality is polarizing, with some students praising clear step-by-step explanations and .

Format shift

The online review is negative, while and severe criticism.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Grades are described as heavily based on quizzes, midterms, exams, and .

Format shift

Online assessment detail is limited, while .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with praise for clear explanations and but , and attendance pressure.

Main concern

Strict grading and students who understand the material.

What students said

“You can get all the questions technically right on the exam and still score an F on it.”
MATH114
“If you want to learn math she is the .”
MATH60

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The only online review is strongly negative and claims students failed, but .

Main concern

The online evidence is only one old, very negative review.

What students said

“She won't ! You will regret it like I did she failed the whole class she thinks she's good but in reality she's not even close.”
MATH

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk is high because reviews repeatedly mention hard exams, strict point deductions, and tests.

Test HeavyStrict GradingTake-Home QuizzesHard ExamsOpen Notes Mentioned

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

hard exams, frequent quizzes, and some take-home quizzes or open-note tests depending on class.

Hard ExamsStrict GradingTake-Home QuizzesOpen Notes Mentioned
“The , and the weekly work is like a full-time job in its own right.”
MATH114
“the ”
MATH114
“the only graded things are midterms, short take home .”
MATH6080A

Online

The online review does not clearly prove .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No hand-holding, if you struggle with Math she may not be the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting split , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“She has a way to really break down material for you to understand.”

⚖️

18/100

“You can get all the questions technically right on the exam and still score an F on it.”

🧪

28/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she goes into good depth into the things she teaches
  • She breaks every math problem down to where you can understand it.
  • She can't teach, and made more than half of the .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • ; you can get all of the answers right and get under 50 percent on an exam.
  • She is a very very tough grader, she wants you to solve things fully.
  • Guaranteed A if you do that.

Theme 3

⚠️

  • at least 3 exams and a final.
  • .
  • She if you are tardy!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

86

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because there are 50 reviews across many years with detailed and recurring patterns, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 538
4 out of 516
3 out of 59
2 out of 511
1 out of 512

Course coverage

MATH6018 reviews
MATH1149 reviews
MATH807 reviews
MATH405 reviews
602 reviews
Show 7 more courses
MATH6080A2 reviews
MATH80A2 reviews
202801 review
MATH1 review
math1041 review
MATH80B1 review
MATHMATH1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

34 reported outcomes

A range

8

A 8

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

7

C+ 2 · C 5

D range

5

D+ 2 · D 3

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3