AI Rate Professor

English

Letitia Deon

ENGL102 · ENGL103 · ENG72 · CWL161 · ENG26408 · ENG52 · ENG26950 · ENGL100 · ENG20 · ENG102 · ENGLISH100 · ENGL20 · CWL100 · ENG100 · ENG103 · CWL213 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
74/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
76.47%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you like interactive, comedy-based English classes, but be cautious online because .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and funnyGroup projectsHarsh online gradingParticipation mattersUnclear instructions at times
  • caring style, comedy-based teaching, and low-stress classroom.
  • Recent online reviews warn about harsh grading, , and no late work.
  • The class usually rewards participation and completion, but writing workload and group work are common.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic when students participate and finish the writing work, but and strict late-work rules reduce the easy-A value.

Online evidence is stricter and riskier, while participation and completed work.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The English content is usually manageable and often made approachable through comedy, but , and .

In-person reviews make the course sound easier and more engaging, while and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly treated as important, and class start.

Attendance evidence mainly comes from in-person classes, while online reviews do not clearly prove a .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

72/100

Most long-term in-person students recommend her for caring support and a fun classroom, but recent online reviews create real hesitation.

In-person recommendation is strong, while online recommendation is divided and recently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Older in-person reviews describe flexible and , but recent online reviews repeatedly call her a .

Format shift

Online grading is the main strictness concern, while as negotiable or manageable.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students mention , and group projects, but many say the workload is manageable if completed on time.

Format shift

Online reviews mention many papers, while and participation-heavy work.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

as caring, funny, and engaging, but some students report and weak online responsiveness.

Format shift

In-person teaching quality is much stronger than online, where communication and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Grades appear , and group projects rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize writing assignments, with and participation.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students usually describe her as caring, funny, and low-stress, with manageable work if students participate and .

Main concern

, and unclear essay instructions may frustrate some students.

What students said

“all you have to do is get your work done participate and you will be fine”
ENG103
“She .”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are sharply mixed, with older praise for and but recent serious complaints about harsh grading and AI detector decisions.

Main concern

AI detection and are clear.

What students said

“RUN. I had her online, might be different in person.”
ENG103
“The assignments were well explained, however she is a and will not accept any late work or assignments.”
ENG100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews provide limited exam evidence, with some mentions of pop quizzes and essay-based finals but .

Pop Quizzes MentionedEssay Final MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an , but exam format is not consistently described.

Pop Quizzes MentionedEssay Final MentionedGroup Project Final Mentioned
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
ENG72
“ and a group project.”
CWL213

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Deon is one of the most caring and hilarious professor I've ever met.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She genuinely cares for her students and tries to make the work load as less as possible.”

⚖️

52/100

“The professor is a but other then that the class was okay.”

📚 Workload Reality

58/100

“Her class work could be overwhelming at times but as long as you do your part, you will do great!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches lectures through comedy and it's a great way to learn.
  • She uses movies to teach and makes everything so easy to understand.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • As long as you put in effort and do the work, you can be guaranteed an A.
  • She is a and will not accept any late work or assignments.

Theme 3

💬 About Online Concerns

  • Obsessed with Turnitin's AI detector and doesn't believe it can give false positives.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 35 reviews across many years, with consistent format differences and many detailed comments.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 57
3 out of 55
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1008 reviews
ENG1036 reviews
ENG524 reviews
CWL1002 reviews
ENG722 reviews
Show 11 more courses
ENGL1002 reviews
ENGL202 reviews
CWL1611 review
CWL2131 review
ENG1021 review
ENG201 review
ENG264081 review
ENG269501 review
ENGL1021 review
ENGL1031 review
ENGLISH1001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 8 · A- 2

B range

6

B+ 3 · B 1 · B- 2

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 1