AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Joseph Ninh

MATH40 · MATH112 · MATHA · MATH52A · MATH115 · MATH80 · FINIT115 · MATH155 · MATH116 · MATH70 · MATH60 · MATH190 · MATH140 · MATH114 · MATH80A · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
55/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
53.85%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you can attend consistently, do lots of homework, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear Math LecturerLots of HomeworkTest HeavyFair CurvePolarizing Support
  • Students often praise his clarity, structure, and passion when they keep up with the work.
  • The course can be exam-heavy, and effort.
  • Reviews are very polarized across time, courses, and formats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Good grades are realistic with , and , but this is not a low-effort A.

Online evidence includes both an easy recent A and older test-heavy warnings, while .

Is the course easy?

Standard

44/100

The math itself is manageable when explained well, but , and .

Online courses can become self-taught, while and notes.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

38/100

as formally mandatory, but many reviews say skipping class makes passing much harder.

Online attendance is less relevant, while .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

He is recommended by students who like structured math instruction, but avoided by students who struggle with .

Both formats are mixed, with online reviews more divided and in-person reviews showing stronger praise from prepared students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

54/100

Students mention and required work, but , and fair grading when prepared.

Format shift

Online grading can feel unforgiving because exams carry heavy weight, while .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

as substantial and often paired with frequent exams or quizzes.

Format shift

Both formats mention lots of like MyOpenMath or Pearson.

Teaching experience

Average

60/100

, and helpful, while others report confusion, poor communication, or rude responses.

Format shift

, while online reviews more often mention self-teaching or long videos.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Many reviews say tests, exams, and serving as practice or a smaller component.

Format shift

Online and , though homework remains frequent in both.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

with strong teaching for prepared students and harsh outcomes for lost students.

Main concern

Missing class, falling behind, or .

What students said

“He answers questions and moves at a steady pace.”
MATH190
“ and without exelling on test your pretty much skrewed.”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews range from highly recommended .

Main concern

Online students may need and .

What students said

“ . Exams timed 2 hours, no redos”
MATH190
“ .”
MATH155

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and can be difficult or timed, though some students say they match notes and homework.

Timed Online ExamsExam-Heavy GradingHard ExamsCurved Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe difficult and , but do not clearly prove closed-book rules or proctoring policies.

Hard ExamsExam-Heavy GradeManual ExamsShow Work Required
“ ”
MATH112
“ , and must show steps to get all the .”
MATH140

Online

Online reviews explicitly mention , and , but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policies.

Canvas ExamsTimed ExamsNo RedosTest Heavy
“ . Exams timed 2 hours, no redos”
MATH190
“ .”
MATH155

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Expect to work for your grade.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

60/100

“I've never had a professor who was so clear and thorough in .”

📚 Workload

28/100

“Expect to but it will definitely .”

🧪

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He teaches with passion and it shows.
  • He is very thorough and
  • He constantly puts students down, and tells them we will not be successful.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of homework but you have a reasonable time to get it all done
  • .
  • The

Theme 3

💻 About Online Experience

  • Straightforward syllabus and grade book. No surprises with the grading.
  • So you essentially teach yourself in his class
  • . Exams timed 2 hours, no redos

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Forty reviews over many years provide broad evidence, though opinions vary strongly by course, format, and student preparation.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MATH1127 reviews
MATH1555 reviews
MATH1404 reviews
MATH604 reviews
MATH704 reviews
Show 10 more courses
MATH804 reviews
MATH1142 reviews
MATH1902 reviews
MATH402 reviews
FINIT1151 review
MATH1151 review
MATH1161 review
MATH52A1 review
MATH80A1 review
MATHA1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 4 · A 3

B range

4

B+ 1 · B 3

C range

3

C 3

D range

0

No reported values

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 5