Tamar Altebarmakian

ENG72 · ENG20 · ENGLISH20 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 30 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 100/100
RMP rating: 4.7/5
Take again: 92%
Difficulty: 2.2

The decision

She is an excellent pick for students who want supportive writing instruction and do not mind participation or group work.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEasy A potentialClear feedbackGroup discussionCaring supportParticipation matters

Students overwhelmingly praise her as , and encouraging for writing.
as easy and social, with group work and manageable essays.
Online sections are more mixed because deadlines, locked assignments, and workload can feel stricter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable if , and participation work, especially in in-person sections.

, while online reviews show more workload and deadline pressure.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

The , and manageable, though online and ENG103 sections can involve more weekly work.

, while online evidence shows clearer structure but more independent workload.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and punctuality affect grades and participation is central to the class.

Attendance concerns come mainly from in-person reviews, while and locked work.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

93/100

Students recommend her because , and helps students improve their writing.

, while online reviews remain positive overall but include more hesitation.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

90/100

Students repeatedly report fair or , and strong feedback on papers.

Format shift

In-person reviews give the strongest easy-grade evidence, while but includes one complaint about confusing critique.

Workload

Light

72/100

Most students call the workload manageable, with a few essays and short weekly tasks, though some sections require more work.

Format shift

Online sections have more weekly deadline pressure, while as light or manageable.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe her as , and strong at teaching writing.

Format shift

In-person teaching reviews are especially strong, while online reviews praise responsiveness and .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Grades are driven mostly , and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats focus on writing assignments, with online reviews emphasizing weekly Canvas work and and group activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students strongly praise her supportive , and engaging group work.

Main concern

Students who dislike group work, socializing, or .

What students said

“ and don't miss because she marks you down for both”
ENG103

“For anyone that needs a good grade, this is your class”
ENG100

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about clear instructions and feedback, but they mention weekly work, locked assignments, and .

Main concern

Online students need to stay current because and workload can build weekly.

What students said

“ , so you have to stay on top of things in her class and .”
ENG103

“It was a lot of work sometimes.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews show a writing-assignment course with little exam risk and .

Essay-Based AssessmentIn-Class EssayNo Clear Exam Proctoring EvidenceAssignment-Based Grading

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and an in-class essay, but reviews do not clearly prove traditional exam policies or proctoring requirements.

In-Class EssayMajor EssaysPresentations

“You have 2 presentations, 1 in-class essay, 3-4 major essays.”
ENG103

“Only had like 2 major essays throughout the entire semester.”
ENG100

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove exam format, webcam rules, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“She challenged me, but inspired and motivated me to be the .”
Voice snapshots generated from 30 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and participation. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“She made me want to try hard and also helped me a lot with !”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“For anyone that needs a good grade, this is your class”

🗣️ Participation Fit

25/100

“If you aren't social maybe don't take her- you have to talk to a partner basically every class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

She tells you exactly what she wants to see in her papers.
She is willing to help you with anything without hesitation as long as you ask.
and gives fair grades, sometimes more than what you deserve.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

This is a really easy class just make sure you do finish your homework in time to get an A.
Easy and straightforward assignments.
.

Theme 3

🤝 About Participation

You work in groups the whole semester.
She does a lot of group work so participation is important.
but can be made up within 1 week.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 30 reviews across a long time span with consistent praise and enough detail about format, workload, and grading.

Inside 30 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 527

4 out of 51

3 out of 50

2 out of 51

1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG10016 reviews

ENG1039 reviews

ENG202 reviews

ENGLISH202 reviews

ENG721 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 12 · A 9 · A- 2

B range

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

No reported values

D range

D 1

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

Not sure yet 1