AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Pamela Lewandowski

MATH40 · MATH112 · MATH170 · MATH101 · MATH80 · MATH155 · MATH116 · MATH60 · BAB40 · MATH150 · MATH131 · MATH190 · MATH140 · MATH80B · MATH114 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Take Pamela Lewandowski only if you can study independently, keep up with homework, and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyFast lecturesMixed teaching claritySelf-study requiredStrict make-up policy
  • Grades often depend heavily on exams, with .
  • Students are split between clear, straightforward teaching and fast, .
  • Online reviews are more negative about communication, Pearson work, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible, but and strong exam preparation because grades often depend on tests.

Online evidence includes one very easy MATH80 review, but most online and and real effort.

Is the course easy?

Standard

47/100

The course content is not always conceptually extreme, but fast lectures and .

Online reviews vary from super easy to hard to learn, while and self-study.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

because tests are based on notes, and at least one .

In-person comments provide most attendance evidence, while online , and communication.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Students recommend her , but many warn against her because of pace, communication, and .

Online reviews are more negative overall, while and strong warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

because and missed work or weak test performance can hurt heavily.

Format shift

Online reviews mention inconsistent deductions and no make-ups, while tests.

Workload

Heavy

31/100

but still necessary for tests, while online homework is frequently described as heavy and time-consuming.

Format shift

Online workload is clearly heavier, while but still important for .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Teaching quality is mixed, with clear and helpful instruction for some students and .

Format shift

Online reviews criticize videos, Pearson dependence, and communication, while pace.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Assessment is strongly exam-focused, with many reviews saying tests, quizzes, midterms, and .

Format shift

, though online reviews also emphasize Pearson homework.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with some students praising straightforward lectures while others , and .

Main concern

and lectures can move too fast for students who need detailed help.

What students said

“Study hard and you will do well”
MATH190
“Your grade is based only on the exams.”
MATH155

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews describe , and mixed ease depending on the course.

Main concern

Communication and .

What students said

“ ! ....She doesn't teach the class all course ”
MATH80
“There was a lot of hw, 3 exams, 1 final. .”
MATH140

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or formal proctoring.

Test HeavyFew Graded ItemsNo Study GuidesHomework-Based Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe tests based on notes and closed-book policy.

Tests Based On NotesHomework-Based TestsNo Study Guides
“ .”
MATH190
“she doesn't give study guides for any of the exams.”
MATH150

Online

, and no study guides, but they do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book rules.

3 Exams And FinalOptional Practice TestsNo Study Guides
“There was a lot of hw, 3 exams, 1 final.”
MATH140
“Graded only by exams & she gives NO STUDY GUIDES for them.”
MATH190

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just put some real effort in and you'll make it through.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“ , but if you can study on your own you'll be fine”

🧪

82/100

“Your grade is based only on the exams.”

⚖️ Grade Effort

42/100

“Study hard and you will do well”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very straight-forward professor.
  • Lectures were very fast, and she did problems back to back without thoroughly explaining problems
  • She was very straightforward teaching Calculus 1

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • Your grade in this class .
  • all the problems on the assigns
  • Do all the HW she assigns, study your notes well

Theme 3

💻 About Online Class

  • all course
  • .
  • Horrible at communication.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 43 reviews span many years and consistently repeat themes of , and mixed teaching clarity.

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 510
3 out of 57
2 out of 510
1 out of 55

Course coverage

MATH1906 reviews
MATH1405 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
MATH805 reviews
MATH1164 reviews
Show 12 more courses
MATH1554 reviews
MATH1122 reviews
MATH602 reviews
MATH80B2 reviews
1901 review
601 review
BAB401 review
MATH1011 review
MATH1141 review
MATH1311 review
MATH1701 review
MATH401 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

5

B 5

C range

2

C 2

D range

1

D 1

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

4

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Not sure yet 1