AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Jasmine Dunn

PSYC101 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
16/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
30%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

unless you are comfortable with , and mostly self-directed learning.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough GraderLecture HeavyPaper HeavyUnclear FeedbackAttendance Matters
  • Students , and weak feedback.
  • The workload is writing-heavy, with many essays, papers, and notes from lectures or the book.
  • A few students found her caring or helpful, but the .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears possible, but students say it , and tolerance for strict grading.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The psychology content is made harder , and heavy writing.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly described as important, and missing class can leave students far behind.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students warn against taking her because of , and .

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say points .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The class is , and lecture-heavy preparation.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

24/100

Reviews often say she reads slides or the book, communicates unclearly, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Comments emphasize papers, essays, homework, notes, and the burden.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

20 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a lecture-heavy, writing-heavy class with and uneven teaching clarity.

Main concern

Students struggle with , and .

What students said

“She is a .”
PSYC101
“She just reads off the ”
PSYC101
“There will be weekly papers with word limits of around 500-1000.”
20500

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence is limited, but students mention book-based tests and .

Book-Based TestsWeirdly Worded QuizzesStudy From Book

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring rules.

Book-Based TestsWeirdly Worded Quizzes
“DONT STUDY FROM NOTES STUDY FROM BOOK”
PSYC101
“ .”
PSYC101
“ .”
20500

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She confuses more than she teaches. I advise you stay away from this class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

24/100

“She confuses more than she teaches.”

⚖️

18/100

“She grades really hard and expects us to know what she's thinking.”

📚 Workload

25/100

“There will be weekly papers with word limits of around 500-1000.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She just reads off the
  • She does not clearly express her expectations to the class
  • Professor just stood in front of the class and read straight out of the textbook.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is a .
  • she doesn't believe in
  • This professor literally gave me a 15 out of 20 because I forgot to add a citation into a research paper.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Most of the .
  • Will assign assignments with minimum words count from 500-1,000 words!
  • This class had me stressing over long papers she had us do each week

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 20 recent in-person reviews are detailed and , and lecture style.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 54
2 out of 55
1 out of 58

Course coverage

PSYC1018 reviews
205006 reviews
208016 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

20 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 4

B range

9

B+ 3 · B 6

C range

3

C+ 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1