AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Bobby Ojose

MATH140 · MATH80 · MATH112 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid him unless , and self-teaching through confusing math lectures.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerStrict attendanceTough graderConfusing lecturesParticipation pressureMixed workload
  • Most recent reviews strongly warn against taking him because of , and harsh classroom dynamics.
  • A few older reviews say he can be fair and helpful if students attend, participate, and use study guides.
  • Getting through the , and tolerance for a strict style.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

A good grade is possible only with , and test preparation, and recent reviews describe harsh grading pressure.

and study-guide-like tests, while recent online and in-person reviews make the A feel much harder.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

31/100

The math content becomes harder because many students say the and formulas or methods are not clearly taught.

Online reviews stress confusing explanations, while and participation pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

as mandatory, with tardies or absences counted harshly and sometimes leading to being dropped.

In-person evidence is especially strict, while and participation matter.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and negative treatment of students.

Both formats are mostly negative, though a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Many reviews tag him as a , though a few older students say points, , and study guides can help.

Format shift

Recent in-person and online reviews show strict grading, while .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, but some sections include lots of , and required participation.

Format shift

Online summer reviews report heavy weekly chapters and tests, while .

Teaching experience

Awful

21/100

Most reviews describe , harsh reactions to questions, and poor support despite a few older positive experiences.

Format shift

Online reviews are consistently negative about clarity, while but recently very negative.

Assessment method

Balanced

63/100

Grades appear to , and tests, with tests carrying major stress in many reviews.

Format shift

Online reviews mention emailed tests and frequent tests, while , and exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are split by time, but recent comments , and .

Main concern

and absences affecting enrollment or grades.

What students said

“Being even one minute late is considered an absence.”
MATH112
“ .”
MATH112

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mostly negative, citing confusing explanations, rude responses to questions, required participation, and heavy summer pacing.

Main concern

Students and support is weak.

What students said

“ , and he often confuses himself.”
MATH112
“Don't do it. .”
MATH112

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because recent reviews emphasize complex tests and memorization, despite older comments saying tests can match study guides.

Test HeavyMemorized FormulasStudy Guide Similar To TestsTake-Home Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

34/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention complex tests requiring memorized formulas, while older positive reviews say tests can match study guides or class packets.

Memorized FormulasStudy Guide Similar To TestsTake-Home Quizzes
“ memorized.”
MATH112
“ because they are the same as the study guide.”
MATH80

Online

and frequent summer tests, but do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Emailed TestsTwo Tests Each WeekTest Heavy
“ and HW to him but and gives 0/10 all the time.”
MATH112
“ ”
MATH140

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't do it. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

21/100

“ , and he often confuses himself.”

⚠️

5/100

“Being even one minute late is considered an absence.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ . .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The .
  • Not a good lecturer.
  • Half the time he does not know how to work his own math problems out.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This professor is strict and serious
  • , but memorized.
  • He gives a lot of and .

Theme 3

🚪

  • and counts tardies against you.
  • participation as well as .
  • He randomly calls on people to participate in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The 22 reviews include recent and detailed comments across online and negative experiences.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH11215 reviews
MATH1404 reviews
MATH803 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

14 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

4

B 3 · B- 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

6

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 3