AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Lizette Veloz-Rendon

NRSG220 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
4.7

The decision

unless you specifically want a very demanding clinical instructor and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnsupportive clinicalsHeavy pressureHigh standardsLots of paperwork
  • Most students describe clinicals as extremely stressful, harsh, and discouraging.
  • Grading and expectations feel strict, especially around reports, SBAR, and preparation.
  • One positive review says her high standards improved learning, but it is outweighed by repeated negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Some students earned A grades, but comments show the emotional and clinical effort required is very high.

All evidence comes from in-person clinical reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The clinical experience is described as highly technical, stressful, and .

Only in-person clinical evidence exists, and .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

Participation and preparation appear required for clinical success, though .

All evidence is from in-person clinical reviews; there is .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

16/100

because they felt unsupported, humiliated, and graded harshly.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation signal is strongly negative except for one positive review.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students repeatedly call her a and say reports are never good enough.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Reviews mention lots of , and intense clinical pressure.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments describe her as unsupportive, humiliating, and discouraging despite one review praising her standards.

Format shift

against five negative reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Comments focus more on clinical reports, SBAR, papers, preparation, and participation than on exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

grading, lack of support, humiliation, and heavy pressure.

Main concern

Students repeatedly report feeling unsupported, targeted, or humiliated in clinicals.

What students said

“She puts you down and try's to humiliate you in front of others, nurses, and doctors.”
NRSG220
“Made clinical the .”
NRSG220

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring rule, open-book policy, midterm, or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Made clinical the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: Medium.

⚠️ Teaching Experience

20/100

“ because I didn't feel supported by her.”

📉

10/100

“Report will never be good enough for her.”

🧱 Workload And Stress

14/100

“Appreciate the challenge, but I prefer instructors who don't make clinicals feel like Survivor!!!!”

Theme 1

👩‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Some people just aren't meant for teaching, especially if they don't connect with students.
  • I hope she considers how her behavior affects students.
  • She is consistent and fair, while also holding students to a high standard.

Theme 2

📋 About Clinical Expectations

  • She expects you to be prepared and .
  • Either it's too much details or too little details.
  • Failing students for SBAR is ridiculous

Theme 3

⚖️ And Support

  • I didn't feel supported by her.
  • Report will never be good enough for her.
  • She is very very tough, too technical

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because there are only 6 reviews, but they are recent, detailed, and mostly consistent.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

NRSG2206 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1