AI Rate Professor

Business

Mehran Gharib

ECON202 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
71/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him if you participate, attend, and , but if you need calm lectures and extensive exam review.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEngaging LecturesParticipation MattersExam HeavyFair GradingMixed Temperament
  • Many students find him engaging and and .
  • Grades depend heavily on a few tests, participation, and staying current with lectures.
  • because some students report anger, off-topic lectures, and weak test preparation.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic with participation, notes, and , but the few heavily weighted tests make it more than a free grade.

Online evidence says assignments are straightforward, while and tests.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

Students say the content is not difficult, but missed lectures and .

Online evidence suggests a simple requirement course, while and exams.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

because participation matters and missing lecture leaves few ways to catch up.

The ; the online review does not clearly discuss attendance flexibility.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and fair expectations, but negative experiences lower confidence.

The online review is strongly positive, while frustration.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

and sometimes easy, but a few tests and .

Format shift

Online grading sounds straightforward, while and participation.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

, and three tests, but students do not describe it as constant or overwhelming.

Format shift

Online workload is described as straightforward, while and test pressure.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Several students call him engaging, caring, and fun, but one review reports anger and off-topic lectures.

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is very positive but limited, while and more mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades , and some essays.

Format shift

, while the online review only mentions straightforward assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews praise his engagement and fairness but warn that , and .

Main concern

A , and some students found his temperament stressful.

What students said

“Homework and and as long as you participate in class and .”
ECON202
“There are 3 short tests but .”
ECON202
“screamed at us too many times for not wanting to go up to the board”
ECON202

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Easy A Hunter

The online review is very positive and .

Main concern

Evidence is limited to one online review.

What students said

“Amazing class to fulfill requirements!”
ECON202
“ day/time.”
ECON202

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews clearly show a few heavily weighted tests, but they do not clearly prove open-book rules, proctoring, or .

Three Short TestsTest HeavyFew Graded Items

Assessment risk

Standard

56/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

large share of the grade, with no clear proof of open-book rules or proctoring.

Three Short TestsTest HeavyFew Graded Items
“There are 3 short tests but .”
ECON202
“10 homework assignments and 3 test the whole semester.”
ECON202

Online

The online review does not clearly prove the final format.

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“My fav prof ever! So many students view him negatively but imo he makes lectures actually relate to irl and is very engaging.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“he makes lectures actually relate to irl and is very engaging.”

📈 Grade Path

68/100

“Homework and and as long as you participate in class and .”

⚠️ Main Risk

56/100

“There are 3 short tests but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • My fav prof ever!
  • He is very much into what he teaches.
  • Goes off topic a lot to talk about his life more than teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Grades and Exams

  • Do god on the exams and you will get a good grade.
  • There are 3 short tests but .
  • day/time.

Theme 3

🙋 About Participation

  • Also participate that's like 10% of your grade.
  • unless you're already really good at math
  • screamed at us too many times for not wanting to go up to the board

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Five recent reviews give useful detail, but the online evidence is only one review and .

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON2025 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values