AI Rate Professor

Art

Sergio Teran

2DCLASS · ART · ART120 · 2D · ART110 · ART116 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
90/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
80.95%
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

Take him for in-person studio art if you will show up, participate, and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerSupportive CritiquesProject HeavyAttendance MattersFun Studio EnergyMostly Lenient
  • , and hands-on art guidance.
  • and manageable if students attend, participate, and .
  • Online summer reviews are much harsher, , and poor organization.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

A good grade is very reachable with , and completed projects, but low-effort work can be penalized.

, while online summer reviews report tougher grading and tighter deadlines.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course is approachable and skill-building, but , and steady work.

and manageable class, while online reviews make the course sound more stressful.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Students repeatedly say attendance, participation, and being on time are important for passing and learning.

Both formats mention attendance or participation, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

88/100

Students recommend him because , and makes studio art engaging.

, while online evidence is mixed because of two negative summer reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Most students say he rewards effort and improvement, though and as tough.

Format shift

and fair, while online summer reviews describe harsh grading.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload centers on art projects, sketchbooks, critiques, and practice, with and material costs.

Format shift

In-person workload is steady but manageable, while online summer workload is described as compressed and stressful.

Teaching experience

Excellent

93/100

Students consistently describe him as caring, funny, skilled, patient, and .

Format shift

, while online evidence is more mixed because of organization complaints.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Grades are mainly based on projects, artwork, sketchbooks, critiques, participation, and a few major assignments.

Format shift

Both formats focus on project work, with online reviews emphasizing deadlines and in-person reviews emphasizing critiques and class work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews are strongly positive, describing a and fair project expectations.

Main concern

The main concern is that attendance and .

What students said

“There is always projects but if you do them and practice what you're taught, you will pass.”
ART110
“Just show up to class, do your work, and you will pass.”
ART120

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online reviews are split, with one positive participation-focused review and two severe complaints about deadlines and grading.

Main concern

The main concern is short deadlines and .

What students said

“Literally gave 4 hours for an assignment and it was worth 100 points.”
ART120
“ . Loads of information is given throughout the lectures as well as peer reviews.”
ART110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course appears mostly project-based, and reviews do not clearly prove a .

Project-Based AssessmentCritiquesParticipationPossible Multiple-Choice Final

Assessment risk

Varies

65/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and critiques, with one review mentioning a multiple-choice final, but no consistent exam policy is proved.

ProjectsCritiquesMultiple-Choice Final
“there's two main projects that are worth 200 points (midterm and final)”
2D
“Just study for the is multiple choice and mainly vocabulary)”
ART110

Online

Online reviews mention lectures, peer reviews, assignments, and participation, but do not clearly prove webcam, Lockdown Browser, proctoring, open-book, midterm, or .

AssignmentsPeer ReviewsParticipation
“Loads of information is given throughout the lectures as well as peer reviews.”
ART110
“Professor has short deadlines for most assignments.”
ART120

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Really easy to get along with on a personal level, excellent communication skills with regards to the subject matter, genuinely cares about the student's grades and if you are struggling, gives excellent examples.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

93/100

“Outstanding ... , freely gives tips and hints for techniques and ways to complete the projects while maintaining personal style.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

88/100

“100% recommend he was one of .”

📌 Attendance and Effort

22/100

“Must come to class if you want to pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • but get ready to put the work in.
  • He is one of the best art teachers at Cerritos college, he really cares about students.
  • Awesome instructor. Cares about students,demonstrates patience and respects individual styles of artists.

Theme 2

🎨 About Projects and Workload

  • There is always projects but if you do them and practice what you're taught, you will pass.
  • expect to work in class and and projects.
  • Make because it will pile up.

Theme 3

📈 About Grades and Effort

  • Just show up to class, do your work, and you will pass.
  • He is pretty cool, easy A as long as you passed your worked on time.
  • if you just mess around it'll show on your grade.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 35 reviews with strong consistency in and a smaller but important online sample showing format risk.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 528
4 out of 53
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ART11017 reviews
ART1209 reviews
2DCLASS3 reviews
2D2 reviews
ART2 reviews
Show 1 more courses
ART1162 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 3 · A 9 · A- 1

B range

5

B 4 · B- 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values