AI Rate Professor

English

Judy Crozier

ENGL102 · ENG20 · ENG52 · ENG100 · ENG103 · 16 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

Take Crozier if you can handle lots of writing and , but if you need a light or highly organized class.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHeavy writing workloadHelpful feedbackRewrite opportunitiesFlexible but pickyMixed organization
  • and flexible, especially through revisions and feedback.
  • The workload is essay-heavy and can feel overwhelming, especially online.
  • Student experience is polarized, with strong praise for support but sharp criticism of organization and instructions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

66/100

Good grades are realistic because of rewrites and , but students must keep up with and detailed expectations.

, while online reviews show more workload stress and withdrawals.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The writing itself is manageable for many students, but the volume of essays and detailed instructions make the course feel demanding.

Online sections sound more overwhelming, while .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

Attendance helps because participation and communication matter, but reviews .

, while online reviews focus more on module work and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

65/100

and revision chances, but workload and organization issues make her risky for others.

, while online reviews are sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

Rewrites, , and revision chances make .

Format shift

Both formats mention or rewrites, but online students also describe stricter and more specific requirements.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly mention many essays, lots of , and overload.

Format shift

Online reviews sound heavier and more frustrating, while but manageable.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Many students praise her encouragement and feedback, but several describe her as scattered or unclear.

Format shift

, while online feedback is more polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

The course is driven by essays, rewrites, reading, modules, and .

Format shift

Both online and and assignments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are more favorable overall, emphasizing feedback, flexibility, rewrites, and manageable essays.

Main concern

Some in-person students find her scattered, convoluted, or disorganized.

What students said

“There are but she provides plenty of opportunities to improve and revise essays.”
ENG100
“Completely scattered in her thought.”
ENG103

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are split between students who value and rewrites and students who find the workload overwhelming.

Main concern

Online students most often complain about too much work, picky requirements, and .

What students said

“Too much overload work and will pretty much take away time .”
ENG100
“Professor Crozier's course can seem overwhelming at first.”
ENG103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mainly describe essays and revisions, and they .

Essay-based assessmentExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a , but do not clearly prove closed-book exams or proctoring.

Final EssayEssay-based assessment
“the course consists of lots of essays, 5 if I remember correctly, don't quote me, and a ”
ENG103

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“There are but she provides plenty of opportunities to improve and revise essays.”

Voice snapshots generated from 16 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and organization. Credibility rating: High.

✍️ Workload Reality

28/100

“Too much overload work and will pretty much take away time .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“She is very encouraging and .”

⚖️

72/100

“ and .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Be ready to read and write (with no ai) because the course consists of lots of essays.
  • There are but she provides plenty of opportunities to improve and revise essays.
  • but she gives you more than enough time to finish

Theme 2

📝 and Revisions

  • She gives a lot of feed back and allows re-writes to help improve your grade.
  • You have so and get a better grade.
  • She gives at least 3 chances for which helps a lot!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Organization

  • Completely scattered in her thought.
  • Very convoluted. Horrible instructions.
  • She wants everything in specific way.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

16

Recent reviews read by the AI

16

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

The rating is credible because 16 reviews cover both formats, recent and older terms, and detailed pros and cons.

Inside 16 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1038 reviews
ENG1004 reviews
ENG522 reviews
ENG201 review
ENGL1021 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

8

A+ 4 · A 4

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Not sure yet 1