AI Rate Professor

Anatomy

Bradley Huss

ANAT150 · PHYSIO151 · AP151 · AP150 · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.1/5
Take again
78.13%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take Bradley Huss if you will study consistently and use his study guides, especially for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear study guidesExtra creditCaring professorLecture heavyExam focused
  • Most recent in-person reviews are very positive and , and many extra-credit chances.
  • The course content is detailed and , so students still need steady studying to earn high grades.
  • Older online reviews are mixed, with and self-teaching.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

70/100

and , but students repeatedly say an A still requires steady studying.

In-person evidence is stronger and more positive, while online evidence also mentions leniency but more self-teaching.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Physiology and anatomy are content-heavy and detailed, but and study guides make the material manageable.

In-person students more often say he simplifies difficult material, while online .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

and labs, but reviews do not prove a strict attendance policy.

and using office hours, while online reviews focus on watching lecture videos.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

83/100

Most students recommend him because , and gives practical tools to succeed despite a demanding course.

Recommendation is very strong in recent in-person reviews but mixed in older online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Grades are helped by , study guides, fair exams, and , though effort is still required.

Format shift

Both formats mention leniency or , but .

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is steady with , and , but it is not described as overwhelming by most recent students.

Format shift

Online reviews mention spending a lot of time with lectures, while and guides.

Teaching experience

Good

84/100

Recent in-person students describe him as , and helpful, but older online reviews report unclear and .

Format shift

Teaching quality is much stronger in .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews consistently emphasize , and written exam portions.

Format shift

Both formats are exam centered, with and practicum detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

25 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, emphasizing clear explanations, useful study guides, , and a .

Main concern

The material is detailed and .

What students said

“He provides study guides for and his SG's are basically like the exams.”
AP151
“Professor Huss is able to explain complicated topics in a simplified way which is great.”
AP151
“you need to put in the work to earn an A”
AP151

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online reviews are mixed, with some students praising lenient exams and lecture videos while others say the and require self-teaching.

Main concern

Online lecture clarity is inconsistent.

What students said

“Study guides are very similar to exams & I never had trouble getting in contact with him.”
AP151
“Lecture videos are not always clear, .”
AP151
“ and is a rather lenient prof but u still need to spend a lot of time w his lecture.”
AP151

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are usually study-guide aligned and fair, but they are detailed and require preparation, with only one review explicitly saying notes were allowed.

Study Guides Similar To ExamsExtra CreditDetailed ExamsNotes Allowed In One ReviewLab Quizzes And Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

67/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

close to exams, lab quizzes, and one note-allowed exam comment, but closed-book status is not clearly proven.

Study Guides Similar To ExamsDetailed ExamsShort EssaysNotes Allowed In One Review
“He doesn't do any trick questions but if you really want to pass this class, YOU HAVE TO STUDY!!”
AP151
“There are .”
AP151
“allows notes to be used in exams”
AP151

Online

Online reviews say exams are based on study guides or lecture videos, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, webcam, Lockdown Browser, or open-book policy.

Study Guides Similar To ExamsLecture Video Based ExamsNo Clear Proctoring Evidence
“Study guides ”
AP151
“Exam content is based on the lecture videos so .”
AP151

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Professor Huss is the regret it! He provides plenty of opportunities to succeed, but you need to put in the work to earn an A”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

84/100

“Professor Huss is able to explain complicated topics in a simplified way which is great.”

📈 Grade Path

70/100

“He provides plenty of opportunities to succeed, but you need to put in the work to earn an A”

🧪

67/100

“He provides study guides for and his SG's are basically like the exams.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He truly cares about student success and goes above and beyond to help students understand the material.
  • Professor Huss is able to explain complicated topics in a simplified way which is great.
  • Not and so many opportunities to succeed, he cares about his students and can accommodate when needed.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • YOU HAVE TO STUDY!!
  • He offers plenty of .
  • Study guides and lecture notes will give you a sure path to an A if you study hard.

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Lecture videos are not always clear, .
  • Study the powerpoints and you're good.
  • His lecture YouTube videos will seriously have you pass the class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 32 reviews span many years, include detailed course evidence, and separate a .

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 520
4 out of 54
3 out of 51
2 out of 54
1 out of 53

Course coverage

AP15125 reviews
PHYSIO1514 reviews
AP1502 reviews
ANAT1501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 4 · A 10

B range

7

B+ 5 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 4