AI Rate Professor

Speech

Cynthia A Lavariere

SOEECH235 · SPEECH132 · SPCH235 · SPEECH120 · SPEECH110 · SPEECH130 · SPEEC100 · COMM103 · SPEECH100 · SPCH110 · SPCH0132 · SPCH100 · SP100 · COM100 · SPC100 · COMM100 · SPEECH235 · SPCH132 · 91 lifetime ratings

AI rating
81/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
74.19%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

if you want a supportive speech professor and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring and accessibleHeavy weekly workFlexible with late workSometimes unclearSpeech-project focused
  • Students often praise Cynthia A Lavariere as , and willing to work with students.
  • The , and projects, especially in compressed formats.
  • Reviews are mixed on organization and grading, with some students calling the class easy and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

An A is realistic for students who keep up with weekly work, speeches, and essays, but it is not a low-effort A.

Online reviews include some easy-grader comments, while , and speeches.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

64/100

The speech content is generally manageable, but the course , and presentations stack up.

Online students more often call the course easy, while and paper requirements.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

58/100

participation matters and others focusing more on assignment completion.

and participation more often, while online evidence mainly discusses communication and deadlines.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

, and responsive despite workload and organization complaints.

Both formats are mostly favorable, but online reviews and grading.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

62/100

She is often flexible with late work and extra help, but several .

Format shift

Online reviews are split between easy grading and , while .

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and projects.

Format shift

Both formats mention work, but and speech-heavy classes show the strongest workload concerns.

Teaching experience

Good

78/100

Students often describe her as , and engaging, but some report confusion and disorganization.

Format shift

Online reviews highlight accessibility, while instruction and organization issues.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment , and participation rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments, with , and reaction papers.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

38 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and engaging professor with substantial speeches, papers, readings, and occasional complaints about organization.

Main concern

The workload can pile up, and some students find directions or .

What students said

“The 9-week format means lots of work, but and .”
COMM103
“Great speech teacher.”
SPCH100
“ and .”
SPEECH100

Remote format

Online

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online reviews are mostly positive about responsiveness and support, but a .

Main concern

Online students should communicate early and .

What students said

“ and you can tell she loves teaching.”
COMM100
“ .”
COMM100
“ give me half the credit for it.”
COMM100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews point more to speeches, papers, quizzes, and , so .

Speeches and presentationsDebate finalSome hard tests mentionedExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention speeches, presentations, a , and some tests, but do not clearly prove a .

Speeches and presentationsDebate finalSome hard tests mentioned
“the ”
COMM103
“two speeches towards the end”
SPCH100
“the book was little help with ”
SPCH235

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, open-book, midterm, or .

Exam policy not clearly proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The 9-week format means lots of work, but and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and format differences. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

78/100

“She is an awesome Professor.”

👍 Recommendation Level

76/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“This class requires LOTS of readings and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 Teaching and Support

  • She .
  • She is an awesome Professor.
  • Very helpful with her students.

Theme 2

📚 Workload and Assignments

  • The 9-week format means lots of work
  • This class requires LOTS of readings and .
  • There will be a few assignments every other week that isn't hard but .

Theme 3

⚠️ Organization and

  • Wasn't sure what she wanted half the time.
  • and .
  • She gives a ridiculous amount of homework and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

91

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis uses 50 reviews across many years and both formats, with enough detail to identify stable strengths and recurring concerns.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 558
4 out of 510
3 out of 57
2 out of 58
1 out of 58

Course coverage

SPCH1007 reviews
COM1006 reviews
SP1006 reviews
SPEECH1005 reviews
COMM1004 reviews
Show 15 more courses
SPCH1104 reviews
SPC1003 reviews
COMM1032 reviews
SPEECH1102 reviews
1001 review
SOEECH2351 review
SPCH01321 review
SPCH1321 review
SPCH2351 review
SPEEC1001 review
SPEECH 1001 review
SPEECH1201 review
SPEECH1301 review
SPEECH1321 review
SPEECH2351 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

36 reported outcomes

A range

15

A+ 3 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

13

B+ 7 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 4

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3